Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Analysis / ChasteToons

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have umpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story [[RememberTheNewGuy as if the child has always been there]]. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.

to:

The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have umpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th (umpteen+1)th story [[RememberTheNewGuy as if the child has always been there]]. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story [[RememberTheNewGuy as if the child has always been there]]. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.

to:

The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen umpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story [[RememberTheNewGuy as if the child has always been there]]. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story as if the child has always been there. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.

to:

The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story [[RememberTheNewGuy as if the child has always been there.there]]. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story as if the child has always been there. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.

to:

The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as much as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story as if the child has always been there. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!The Real Reason for Nephews/Neices Than Sons/Daughters

to:

!!The Real Reason for Nephews/Neices Nephews/Nieces Than Sons/Daughters
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!The Real Reason for Nephews/Neices Than Sons/Daughters

The real reason why we often see nephews/nieces in the Duck and Mouse universe and other toon universes rather than sons and daughters is because introducing a nephew or niece doesn’t violate the continuity of the stories in a given work as introducing a son or daughter. It isn’t usually a matter of censorship as many people say. It's just that when you have unpteen stories in a work that establish that a character has no children, you can't have a grown child appearing out of nowhere in the character's (unpteen+1)th story as if the child has always been there. You could do it (as in the case of ''WesternAnimation/GoofTroop'', they did it), but it would generally violate everything about the established continuity, as well as possibly disappointing readers/viewers who feel their intelligence has been insulted. That's why giving a character a nephew/niece is often the only way to create stories in which an adult character, especially with those in cartoons and comics, interacts with a kid.

Top