Follow TV Tropes

Following

History AlternativeCharacterInterpretation / BeautyAndTheBeast

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The book shop owner: Did he really want Belle to keep a book that she's read three times, or did he give her the book so she would not keep coming back, borrowing others and not buying anything from his store?

Changed: 99

Removed: 170

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed a teenager and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
** It's hard to see her as anything else than the BigBad. [[SleepingBeauty Maleficent]] cursed Aurora an she's the villain. Any reason for the enchantress to be diferent?

to:

* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed a teenager and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
** It's hard to see
BigBad, arguing that her as anything else than the BigBad. [[SleepingBeauty Maleficent]] cursed actions were not unlike that of Maleficent cursing Aurora an she's the villain. Any reason for the enchantress to be diferent?in ''Sleeping Beauty''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope was cut/disambiguated due to cleanup


* Is her falling in love with The Beast genuine or the result of serious StockholmSyndrome towards an abusive captor? Trying to puzzle this out will often cause an Administrivia/EditWar.

to:

* Is her falling in love with The Beast genuine or the result of serious StockholmSyndrome UsefulNotes/StockholmSyndrome towards an abusive captor? Trying to puzzle this out will often cause an Administrivia/EditWar.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Does Gaston want to marry Belle because he's attracted to her? Or because he sees doing so as a means of cementing his status as "the best"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's hard to see her as anything else than the BigBad. [[SleepingBeauty Maleficent]] cursed Aurora an she's the villain. Any reason for the enchantress to be diferent?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child[[note]]The flower was said to bloom until he turned 21, and "Be Our Guest" mentions that the servants have had no guests for ten years, meaning that the prince would have only been eleven when he was cursed[[/note]] and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.

to:

* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child[[note]]The flower was said to bloom until he turned 21, and "Be Our Guest" mentions that the servants have had no guests for ten years, meaning that the prince would have only been eleven when he was cursed[[/note]] a teenager and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.

to:

* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child child[[note]]The flower was said to bloom until he turned 21, and "Be Our Guest" mentions that the servants have had no guests for ten years, meaning that the prince would have only been eleven when he was cursed[[/note]] and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* How deserving they were of being cursed alongside Beast is also up for debate. The most common interpretations are either a case of DeliberateValuesDissonance with the staff sharing the same fate as their master regardless of their own personal responsibility, simple collateral damage that was necessary to facilitate the Beast's harsh lesson, or the staff being considered just as much to blame for making the prince the way he was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

AlternativeCharacterInterpretation in ''WesternAnimation/BeautyAndTheBeast''.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The three big problems with this, however, are a.) By the time Gaston learned of the Beast's existence, Belle had already been released and was clearly no longer in need of rescuing, b.) Gaston's original intended line "Time to die!" was changed to "Belle is mine!" specifically to remind the audience of his true motives, and c.) Regardless of Gaston's intentions of killing the Beast, he earlier tried to blackmail Belle into marrying him by threatening to lock her father in an insane asylum run by an evil man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS cleanup, dewicking Adult Fear


* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.

to:

* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] children? Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Cogsworth: Is he the cliché frumpy disciplinarian present in the Disney movies like [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 Zazu]] and [[WesternAnimation/ThePrincessAndTheFrog Lawrence]] or is his personality based more of [[TheWoobie a child under an abusive parent, who's in fear of angering the parent and has to stop others from pissing them off in fear of what happens?]] Given his reaction when he tells to the Beast that Belle isn't coming to dinner, it seems to be leaning more to the latter.

to:

* Cogsworth: Is he the cliché frumpy disciplinarian present in the Disney movies like [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 Zazu]] and [[WesternAnimation/ThePrincessAndTheFrog Lawrence]] or is his personality based more of [[TheWoobie a child under an abusive parent, who's in fear of angering the parent and has to stop others from pissing them off in fear of what happens?]] Given [[OhCrap his reaction reaction]] when he tells to the Beast that Belle isn't coming to dinner, it seems to be leaning more on to the latter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Cogsworth: Is he the cliché frumpy disciplinarian present in the Disney movies like [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 Zazu]] and [[WesternAnimation/ThePrincessAndTheFrog Lawrence]] or is his personality based more of [[TheWoobie a child under an abusive parent, who's in fear of angering the parent and has to stop others from pissing them off in fear of what happens?]]

to:

* Cogsworth: Is he the cliché frumpy disciplinarian present in the Disney movies like [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 Zazu]] and [[WesternAnimation/ThePrincessAndTheFrog Lawrence]] or is his personality based more of [[TheWoobie a child under an abusive parent, who's in fear of angering the parent and has to stop others from pissing them off in fear of what happens?]]happens?]] Given his reaction when he tells to the Beast that Belle isn't coming to dinner, it seems to be leaning more to the latter.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[foldercontrol]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Is she a well-meaning bookworm unfairly made an outcast by the villagers, or is she actually a snob deserving of being ostracised? She certainly wants a more exciting life than what she finds in "this poor provincial town", but at the same time the villagers turn out to be much nastier than they appear...and have no problem with holding up Gaston as a hero and supporting anything he does, including continuing to pursue her even though she's not interested. It doesn't help that the stage musical makes the "snob" interpretation more valid: The additional song "No Matter What" has Maurice actually telling her "They [the villagers] are the common herd/Take my word" -- which also makes ''him'' look bad.
* Alternately, is Belle experiencing a similar character arc to the Beast's, rather than remaining as static as she seems? She's the one person from a wealthy and educated family in a blue-collar town, and she's openly contemptuous of her social inferiors (who would be one step up from serfs in context, while she and her father would be petty nobility). The books she carts around alone are worth enough money to buy half of the village outright, and her father has access to machined gears while everyone else lives in basically the dirt. So does meeting the castle slaves, who are actual serfs, and being won over by them represent an actual character arc, the out-of-touch noblewoman realizing the value of commoners and learning not to be such a jerk to people outside her immediate peers? Is the Belle who is willing to give marrying a literal animal a try the same girl who previously dismissed everyone who couldn't read (a skill quite literally solely possessed by the idle rich and the clergy) as trash?

to:

* Is she a well-meaning bookworm unfairly made an outcast by the villagers, or is she actually a snob deserving of being ostracised? She certainly wants a more exciting life than what she finds in "this poor provincial town", but at the same time the villagers turn out to be much nastier than they appear...and have no problem with holding up Gaston as a hero and supporting anything he does, including continuing to pursue her even though she's not interested. It doesn't help that the stage musical makes the "snob" interpretation more valid: The additional song "No Matter What" has Maurice actually telling her "They [the "[The villagers] are the common herd/Take my word" -- which also makes ''him'' look bad.
* Alternately, ** In the ''WesternAnimation/LiloAndStitch'' [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twZJu9vb1z8 trailer featuring her]] she is even portrayed [[NiceCharacterMeanActor as a very bratty and snobby shrew]], almost at AlphaBitch's levels. Obviously, all this is PlayedForLaughs, but still... Although even in that trailer, one could argue that she was just pissed off at, y'know, ''almost getting crushed by a chandelier.''
* Is her falling in love with The Beast genuine or the result of serious StockholmSyndrome towards an abusive captor? Trying to puzzle this out will often cause an Administrivia/EditWar.
* Is
Belle experiencing a similar character arc to the Beast's, rather than remaining as static as she seems? She's the one person from a wealthy and educated family in a blue-collar town, and she's openly contemptuous of her social inferiors (who would be one step up from serfs in context, while she and her father would be petty nobility). The books she carts around alone are worth enough money to buy half of the village outright, and her father has access to machined gears while everyone else lives in basically the dirt. So does meeting the castle slaves, who are actual serfs, and being won over by them represent an actual character arc, the out-of-touch noblewoman realizing the value of commoners and learning not to be such a jerk to people outside her immediate peers? Is the Belle who is willing to give marrying a literal animal a try the same girl who previously dismissed everyone who couldn't read (a skill quite literally solely possessed by the idle rich and the clergy) as trash?

Added: 1620

Changed: 4747

Removed: 1387

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Other]]
* Perhaps the biggest one, in that it even inspired a lot of debate and even fights behind the scenes, is the question: ''Who'' is the actual protagonist? Belle is certainly the viewpoint character, and most of the story is told from her perspective, but the character who develops and changes the most as a person, and whose actions drive most of the plot, is the ''Beast.'' Lyricist Howard Ashman in particular was convinced of this, and modern critics are more and more inclined to agree.
* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
[[/folder]]

to:

[[folder:Other]]
* Perhaps the biggest one, in that it even inspired a lot of debate and even fights behind the scenes, is the question: ''Who'' is the actual protagonist? Belle is certainly the viewpoint character, and most of the story is told from her perspective, but the character who develops and changes the most as a person, and whose actions drive most of the plot, is the ''Beast.'' Lyricist Howard Ashman in particular was convinced of this, and modern critics are more and more inclined to agree.
* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
[[/folder]]
[[folder:The Servants]]



* Gaston.
** Is he a complete jerk? Is he actually a fun guy with a zest for life who thinks that Belle has been driven mad, because she seems to think that this monster is a nice guy? Is it him who winds up going mad after Belle rejects him and humiliates him in front of the entire town? It's worth noting that he was originally supposed to die by falling off a cliff and laughing hysterically, indicating that he had indeed been driven mad in his desperate effort to impress Belle.
** Another interpretation: Gaston is a man too caught up in being the "ideal man" in his community that he cannot express himself outside of macho stereotypes. It should be noted that while it has the trappings of [[ForbiddenFruit wanting what you are denied]], the audience doesn't really get to see the village itself and the only other women we see are swooning and passive with Gaston. Maybe deep down, he wants the woman who is different because she will actually display a personality despite what tradition says. Unfortunately as a product of the society, Gaston regurgitates these ideals (women shouldn't read & think) because it is what his culture tells him is proper. The fact that Belle is brave enough to buck these traditions despite the pressure of their culture may be what truly appeals to Gaston deep down, as a man so thoroughly trapped by the masculine ideal. Listen to his boastful song, that is either an extremely arrogant man who is supported in his arrogance by his peers, or a deeply insecure man whose life's purpose is "to be the best" and any deviation from that would render him worthless. Ultimately, his unwillingness/inability to change/escape his such trappings, and his twisted approach to courting/acquiring what he desires (Belle) is what leads to his downfall. Not blaming the village itself, as the village showed deep adoration for Gaston, they may have changed too once he was brave enough. However, Gaston had a choice of how he interacted with Belle and he chose poorly many times. As pointed out elsewhere, in a WMG, Beast and Gaston could easily have turned out like each other if a few details were changed.
** Jerk or not, it's a common interpretation that Gaston's response to Belle's situation is much more reasonable than the film treats it. He ignores the town's resident crazy at first, but when he realizes that Belle is actually missing, and that both she and her father were kidnapped by a murderous magical beast... well, he's the town's hunter, taking care of dangerous animals is quite literally his job and from his perspective he isn't forming a mob to attack a misunderstood magical loner, he's rallying the townspeople to protect an unpopular girl in danger. Magic is essentially an OutsideContextProblem that he would have no idea how to deal with.
** A modern interpretation has Gaston as the kind of abusive ex who reacts to a breakup by viciously attacking the life and/or character of their former partner, and escalating their attacks as time goes on.

to:

[[/folder]]
[[folder:Gaston]]
* Gaston.
**
Is he a complete jerk? Is he actually a fun guy with a zest for life who thinks that Belle has been driven mad, because she seems to think that this monster is a nice guy? Is it him who winds up going mad after Belle rejects him and humiliates him in front of the entire town? It's worth noting that he was originally supposed to die by falling off a cliff and laughing hysterically, indicating that he had indeed been driven mad in his desperate effort to impress Belle.
** * Another interpretation: Gaston is a man too caught up in being the "ideal man" in his community that he cannot express himself outside of macho stereotypes. It should be noted that while it has the trappings of [[ForbiddenFruit wanting what you are denied]], the audience doesn't really get to see the village itself and the only other women we see are swooning and passive with Gaston. Maybe deep down, he wants the woman who is different because she will actually display a personality despite what tradition says. Unfortunately as a product of the society, Gaston regurgitates these ideals (women shouldn't read & think) because it is what his culture tells him is proper. The fact that Belle is brave enough to buck these traditions despite the pressure of their culture may be what truly appeals to Gaston deep down, as a man so thoroughly trapped by the masculine ideal. Listen to his boastful song, that is either an extremely arrogant man who is supported in his arrogance by his peers, or a deeply insecure man whose life's purpose is "to be the best" and any deviation from that would render him worthless. Ultimately, his unwillingness/inability to change/escape his such trappings, and his twisted approach to courting/acquiring what he desires (Belle) is what leads to his downfall. Not blaming the village itself, as the village showed deep adoration for Gaston, they may have changed too once he was brave enough. However, Gaston had a choice of how he interacted with Belle and he chose poorly many times. As pointed out elsewhere, in a WMG, Beast and Gaston could easily have turned out like each other if a few details were changed.
** * Jerk or not, it's a common interpretation that Gaston's response to Belle's situation is much more reasonable than the film treats it. He ignores the town's resident crazy at first, but when he realizes that Belle is actually missing, and that both she and her father were kidnapped by a murderous magical beast... well, he's the town's hunter, taking care of dangerous animals is quite literally his job and from his perspective he isn't forming a mob to attack a misunderstood magical loner, he's rallying the townspeople to protect an unpopular girl in danger. Magic is essentially an OutsideContextProblem that he would have no idea how to deal with.
** * A modern interpretation has Gaston as the kind of abusive ex who reacts to a breakup by viciously attacking the life and/or character of their former partner, and escalating their attacks as time goes on.on.
[[/folder]]
[[folder:Other]]
* Perhaps the biggest one, in that it even inspired a lot of debate and even fights behind the scenes, is the question: ''Who'' is the actual protagonist? Belle is certainly the viewpoint character, and most of the story is told from her perspective, but the character who develops and changes the most as a person, and whose actions drive most of the plot, is the ''Beast.'' Lyricist Howard Ashman in particular was convinced of this, and modern critics are more and more inclined to agree.
* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Belle]]
* Is she a well-meaning bookworm unfairly made an outcast by the villagers, or is she actually a snob deserving of being ostracised? She certainly wants a more exciting life than what she finds in "this poor provincial town", but at the same time the villagers turn out to be much nastier than they appear...and have no problem with holding up Gaston as a hero and supporting anything he does, including continuing to pursue her even though she's not interested. It doesn't help that the stage musical makes the "snob" interpretation more valid: The additional song "No Matter What" has Maurice actually telling her "They [the villagers] are the common herd/Take my word" -- which also makes ''him'' look bad.
* Alternately, is Belle experiencing a similar character arc to the Beast's, rather than remaining as static as she seems? She's the one person from a wealthy and educated family in a blue-collar town, and she's openly contemptuous of her social inferiors (who would be one step up from serfs in context, while she and her father would be petty nobility). The books she carts around alone are worth enough money to buy half of the village outright, and her father has access to machined gears while everyone else lives in basically the dirt. So does meeting the castle slaves, who are actual serfs, and being won over by them represent an actual character arc, the out-of-touch noblewoman realizing the value of commoners and learning not to be such a jerk to people outside her immediate peers? Is the Belle who is willing to give marrying a literal animal a try the same girl who previously dismissed everyone who couldn't read (a skill quite literally solely possessed by the idle rich and the clergy) as trash?
[[/folder]]



* Belle:
** Is she a well-meaning bookworm unfairly made an outcast by the villagers, or is she actually a snob deserving of being ostracised? She certainly wants a more exciting life than what she finds in "this poor provincial town", but at the same time the villagers turn out to be much nastier than they appear...and have no problem with holding up Gaston as a hero and supporting anything he does, including continuing to pursue her even though she's not interested. It doesn't help that the stage musical makes the "snob" interpretation more valid: The additional song "No Matter What" has Maurice actually telling her "They [the villagers] are the common herd/Take my word" -- which also makes ''him'' look bad.
** Alternately, is Belle experiencing a similar character arc to the Beast's, rather than remaining as static as she seems? She's the one person from a wealthy and educated family in a blue-collar town, and she's openly contemptuous of her social inferiors (who would be one step up from serfs in context, while she and her father would be petty nobility). The books she carts around alone are worth enough money to buy half of the village outright, and her father has access to machined gears while everyone else lives in basically the dirt. So does meeting the castle slaves, who are actual serfs, and being won over by them represent an actual character arc, the out-of-touch noblewoman realizing the value of commoners and learning not to be such a jerk to people outside her immediate peers? Is the Belle who is willing to give marrying a literal animal a try the same girl who previously dismissed everyone who couldn't read (a skill quite literally solely possessed by the idle rich and the clergy) as trash?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Beast]]
* In a departure from the original story in which the Beast was kind and gentlemanly (if very rarely hot-tempered), the Disney character starts off angry and depressed and has all the classic trappings of the ''villain''.
* Commentary from the filmmakers has fueled theories that the Beast is near-suicidal for much of the film and his rescue of Belle from the wolves was also an attempt to kill himself while doing something meaningful.
* When the Beast decides to spare Gaston; did he do it because Gaston’s words reminded him of when Belle begged to let her father go...or was he reminded of when he was cursed and how he could be offering Gaston the second chance he never got? Both sides insist their interpretation is the correct, intended one.
[[/folder]]



* In a departure from the original story in which the Beast was kind and gentlemanly (if very rarely hot-tempered), the Disney character starts off angry and depressed and has all the classic trappings of the ''villain''.
* Commentary from the filmmakers has fueled theories that the Beast is near-suicidal for much of the film and his rescue of Belle from the wolves was also an attempt to kill himself while doing something meaningful.
* When the Beast decides to spare Gaston; did he do it because Gaston’s words reminded him of when Belle begged to let her father go...or was he reminded of when he was cursed and how he could be offering Gaston the second chance he never got? Both sides insist their interpretation is the correct, intended one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Other]]



* In a departure from the original story in which the Beast was kind and gentlemanly (if very rarely hot-tempered), the Disney character starts off angry and depressed and has all the classic trappings of the ''villain''.
* Commentary from the filmmakers has fueled theories that the Beast is near-suicidal for much of the film and his rescue of Belle from the wolves was also an attempt to kill himself while doing something meaningful.



* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
[[/folder]]
* In a departure from the original story in which the Beast was kind and gentlemanly (if very rarely hot-tempered), the Disney character starts off angry and depressed and has all the classic trappings of the ''villain''.
* Commentary from the filmmakers has fueled theories that the Beast is near-suicidal for much of the film and his rescue of Belle from the wolves was also an attempt to kill himself while doing something meaningful.



* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Perhaps the biggest one, in that it even inspired a lot of debate and even fights behind the scenes, is the question: ''Who'' is the actual protagonist? Belle is certainly the viewpoint character, and most of the story is told from her perspective, but the character who develops and changes the most as a person, and whose actions drive most of the plot, is the ''Beast.'' Lyricist Howard Ashman in particular was convinced of this, and modern critics are more and more inclined to agree.
* In a departure from the original story in which the Beast was kind and gentlemanly (if very rarely hot-tempered), the Disney character starts off angry and depressed and has all the classic trappings of the ''villain''.
* Commentary from the filmmakers has fueled theories that the Beast is near-suicidal for much of the film and his rescue of Belle from the wolves was also an attempt to kill himself while doing something meaningful.
* Fans are divided between thinking the enchantress was a WellIntentionedExtremist, a benevolent fairy, or a particularly cruel member of TheFairFolk who cursed an innocent child and entire castle for [[DisproportionateRetribution a relatively petty offense]] (though breaking or denying SacredHospitality [[ValuesDissonance was a serious offense in old times]]). Some people even view her as the true BigBad.
* When the Beast decides to spare Gaston; did he do it because Gaston’s words reminded him of when Belle begged to let her father go...or was he reminded of when he was cursed and how he could be offering Gaston the second chance he never got? Both sides insist their interpretation is the correct, intended one.
* Belle:
** Is she a well-meaning bookworm unfairly made an outcast by the villagers, or is she actually a snob deserving of being ostracised? She certainly wants a more exciting life than what she finds in "this poor provincial town", but at the same time the villagers turn out to be much nastier than they appear...and have no problem with holding up Gaston as a hero and supporting anything he does, including continuing to pursue her even though she's not interested. It doesn't help that the stage musical makes the "snob" interpretation more valid: The additional song "No Matter What" has Maurice actually telling her "They [the villagers] are the common herd/Take my word" -- which also makes ''him'' look bad.
** Alternately, is Belle experiencing a similar character arc to the Beast's, rather than remaining as static as she seems? She's the one person from a wealthy and educated family in a blue-collar town, and she's openly contemptuous of her social inferiors (who would be one step up from serfs in context, while she and her father would be petty nobility). The books she carts around alone are worth enough money to buy half of the village outright, and her father has access to machined gears while everyone else lives in basically the dirt. So does meeting the castle slaves, who are actual serfs, and being won over by them represent an actual character arc, the out-of-touch noblewoman realizing the value of commoners and learning not to be such a jerk to people outside her immediate peers? Is the Belle who is willing to give marrying a literal animal a try the same girl who previously dismissed everyone who couldn't read (a skill quite literally solely possessed by the idle rich and the clergy) as trash?
* Cogsworth: Is he the cliché frumpy disciplinarian present in the Disney movies like [[WesternAnimation/TheLionKing1994 Zazu]] and [[WesternAnimation/ThePrincessAndTheFrog Lawrence]] or is his personality based more of [[TheWoobie a child under an abusive parent, who's in fear of angering the parent and has to stop others from pissing them off in fear of what happens?]]
* The song "Be Our Guest". Do the servants want to make Belle feel welcomed in the castle and be kind to her, or are they only being extremely courteous to her at dinner because she is able to change them back into humans? (Notably, the original plan was for the characters to sing this to ''Maurice'', which would fall under the former interpretation, but the filmmakers felt it was better to use such a big number in the service of one of the leads.)
* The villagers. Are they misguided people who are [[AdultFear genuinely afraid that the Beast might harm their children?]] Or are they true monsters of this film, since they're the ones who put Gaston on a pedestal and back his more devious plans? The fact that they willingly supported Gaston's plan to blackmail Belle into marrying him, despite his revealing enough of it to know how horrific of a plan it is, with absolutely no sign of fear, strongly supports that theory.
* Gaston.
** Is he a complete jerk? Is he actually a fun guy with a zest for life who thinks that Belle has been driven mad, because she seems to think that this monster is a nice guy? Is it him who winds up going mad after Belle rejects him and humiliates him in front of the entire town? It's worth noting that he was originally supposed to die by falling off a cliff and laughing hysterically, indicating that he had indeed been driven mad in his desperate effort to impress Belle.
** Another interpretation: Gaston is a man too caught up in being the "ideal man" in his community that he cannot express himself outside of macho stereotypes. It should be noted that while it has the trappings of [[ForbiddenFruit wanting what you are denied]], the audience doesn't really get to see the village itself and the only other women we see are swooning and passive with Gaston. Maybe deep down, he wants the woman who is different because she will actually display a personality despite what tradition says. Unfortunately as a product of the society, Gaston regurgitates these ideals (women shouldn't read & think) because it is what his culture tells him is proper. The fact that Belle is brave enough to buck these traditions despite the pressure of their culture may be what truly appeals to Gaston deep down, as a man so thoroughly trapped by the masculine ideal. Listen to his boastful song, that is either an extremely arrogant man who is supported in his arrogance by his peers, or a deeply insecure man whose life's purpose is "to be the best" and any deviation from that would render him worthless. Ultimately, his unwillingness/inability to change/escape his such trappings, and his twisted approach to courting/acquiring what he desires (Belle) is what leads to his downfall. Not blaming the village itself, as the village showed deep adoration for Gaston, they may have changed too once he was brave enough. However, Gaston had a choice of how he interacted with Belle and he chose poorly many times. As pointed out elsewhere, in a WMG, Beast and Gaston could easily have turned out like each other if a few details were changed.
** Jerk or not, it's a common interpretation that Gaston's response to Belle's situation is much more reasonable than the film treats it. He ignores the town's resident crazy at first, but when he realizes that Belle is actually missing, and that both she and her father were kidnapped by a murderous magical beast... well, he's the town's hunter, taking care of dangerous animals is quite literally his job and from his perspective he isn't forming a mob to attack a misunderstood magical loner, he's rallying the townspeople to protect an unpopular girl in danger. Magic is essentially an OutsideContextProblem that he would have no idea how to deal with.
** A modern interpretation has Gaston as the kind of abusive ex who reacts to a breakup by viciously attacking the life and/or character of their former partner, and escalating their attacks as time goes on.

Top