Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 34,37 (click to see context) :
For Website/TheOtherWiki's guide to edit warring, click [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring here]].
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
* The forums, such as Trope Talk (for trope disagreements) or Wiki Talk (for other articles).
to:
* The forums, such as Trope Talk (for trope disagreements) or Wiki Talk (for other articles). Some tropes and work pages also have dedicated cleanup threads in Short- or Long-Term Projects.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This appears to be the only other proposed change on the sandboxed draft that wasn't present; other than that, this page had text that was absent from the sandbox and were added here directly.
Added DiffLines:
[[caption-width-right:350:[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Star_Trek_Into_Darkness/Archive_6#Requested_move_(again) Eventually]], they capitalized it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per the Outdated Administrivia Pages thread
Changed line(s) 16,17 (click to see context) from:
Here, we have a strict policy about edit wars. If you add something, someone changes or removes it, and you change it back, you're edit warring. If someone changes something, you revert it, and they change it again, they are edit warring. The third edit in the chain is the threshold, meaning any troper repeating (or restoring to functionally the same) any of their previous edits on a page. Edit warring is grounds for suspension for all guilty parties.
to:
Here, we have a strict policy about edit wars. If you add person A adds/deletes something, someone person B removes/restores it, and A changes or removes it, and you change it back, you're A is edit warring. If someone B changes something, you revert A reverts it, and they change B changes it again, they are B is edit warring.warring. However, if A adds/deletes something, B removes/restores it, but it's C that changes it back, no one is considered guilty, but it should still be taken to an appropriate venue. The third edit in the chain is the threshold, meaning any troper repeating (or restoring to functionally the same) any of their previous edits on a page. Edit warring is grounds for suspension for all guilty parties.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added a pothole to a relevant policy page, and removed Sectionectomy text since the page lock made it unnecessary
Changed line(s) 29,30 (click to see context) from:
'''Exception:''' We generally recognize exceptions to the edit warring policy in cases where the editor is making an article compliant with wiki policies, such as removing a [[YMMV/HomePage YMMV]] example from a primary article, correcting formatting, or reverting vandalism (such as, but not limited to, unexplained deletions). That said, if someone is edit warring already, continually reverting their work won't help even if it's correct. Get the moderators to deal with the situation instead of fighting a pointless battle.
to:
'''Exception:''' We generally recognize exceptions to the edit warring policy in cases where the editor is making an article compliant with wiki policies, such as removing a [[YMMV/HomePage YMMV]] example from a primary article, correcting formatting, or reverting vandalism (such as, but not limited to, unexplained [[Administrivia/EditReasonsAndWhyYouShouldUseThem unexplained]] deletions). That said, if someone is edit warring already, continually reverting their work won't help even if it's correct. Get the moderators to deal with the situation instead of fighting a pointless battle.
Deleted line(s) 38,41 (click to see context) :
%%
%% No examples, please. This just defines the term.
%%
