The title? That'd be The Problem with Pen Island.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanYou know, I think eventually every single page on the wiki will have a post on the discussion of someone asking why the title is messed up, and Sep citing The Problem with Pen Island.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.I am 80% sure it wasn't a while ago..
I missed the part where that's my problem.is there anything about subversions to this? because while it certainly does seem like a good idea at the time it seems like it could lead you to being guilty of war crimes, or grudges from those close to your enemy, a third side deciding they prefer your enemy or want to be neutral...
Hide / Show RepliesSounds more like a deconstruction.
I missed the part where that's my problem.Could someone fix the caption width? (I tried it, but didn't succeed.)
Is there a specific subtrope wherein the person resorts to biting an opponent?
Hide / Show Replies
I'm seeing a lot of examples, particularly under the Video Games section, of characters kicking opponents when they're down, not stopping when the opponent's been defeated, and just plain being brutal and/or a jerk. Some examples, I found near the top:
I thought Combat Pragmatism is the willingness to do anything in order to defeat opponents, not outright willingness to do anything. It's not simply the opposite of Let's Fight Like Gentlemen or fighting dirty. According to the main article's description, a Combat Pragmatist can have a code of conduct and are associated with creativity and quick thinking. Joseph Joestar, for instance, is a Combat Pragmatist without being brutal: He takes every effort to not drag outsiders into the fight (but is willing to take anyone willing to fight alongside him) and stops once he's beaten his opponent.
Edited by ZombieAladdin