Follow TV Tropes

Following

History WesternAnimation / TheHunchbackOfNotreDameII

Go To

OR

Added: 292

Changed: 292

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:





* InnocentlyInsensitive: When Phoebus suspects that Madellaine is only using Quasimodo so she can get La Fidele for Sarousch, Quasimodo assumes that Phoebus doesn't think someone could love him for his own merits. Phoebus immediately realizes his error and corrects what he means in a slightly more tactful manner.

to:

* InnocentlyInsensitive: InnocentlyInsensitive:
**
When Phoebus suspects that Madellaine is only using Quasimodo so she can get La Fidele for Sarousch, Quasimodo assumes that Phoebus doesn't think someone could love him for his own merits. Phoebus immediately realizes his error and corrects what he means in a slightly more tactful manner.



-->'''Phoebus''': A string of robberies begins the moment a circus comes to town. Coincidence? ''I don't think so.'' How many times have I ever been wrong?\\

to:

-->'''Phoebus''': --->'''Phoebus''': A string of robberies begins the moment a circus comes to town. Coincidence? ''I don't think so.'' How many times have I ever been wrong?\\



-->'''Phoebus''': Achilles, do you believe this? Everybody mad at me! How often does ''that'' happen?\\

to:

-->'''Phoebus''': --->'''Phoebus''': Achilles, do you believe this? Everybody mad at me! How often does ''that'' happen?\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misplaced, moving to the correct tab


* BrokenAesop:
** The message from the original, and in the sequel, is supposed to be that you can't judge by appearances and true beauty is on the inside. Unfortunately, it is distorted by the way that Quasimodo not only falls in love with the beautiful Madellaine, but she also goes through a rather formulaic HeelFaceTurn, and the villain Sarousch is not really all that handsome to the viewer, despite his own vanity, meaning that the viewers get a solid BeautyEqualsGoodness message instead.
** One of the other messages, that prejudice is wrong, is also broken. Phoebus is portrayed as being in the wrong for his prejudice against carnies, and he says that he was wrong at the end. But he wasn't wrong; the carnies really ''were'' stealing from people, and Madellaine was the only exception, so his suspicions were entirely justified!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Foot Focus is no longer a trope.


* FootFocus: Madellaine's barefeet while she practices tightrope-walking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Adding note.

Added DiffLines:

!'''All spoilers for ''WesternAnimation/{{The Hunchback of Notre Dame|Disney}}'' are unmarked. Administrivia/YouHaveBeenWarned!'''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Expanding


Quasimodo falls in love with the beautiful and mysterious Madellaine, while trying to stop a thief posing as a magician from stealing a famous bell from the cathedral's belfry.

to:

Quasimodo (Creator/TomHulce) falls in love with the beautiful and mysterious Madellaine, Madellaine (Creator/JenniferLoveHewitt), while trying to stop Sarousch (Creator/MichaelMcKean), a thief posing as a magician from stealing a famous bell from the cathedral's belfry.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films going forward. The animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' (which can be excused for it being a pilot to [[WesternAnimation/AladdinTheSeries the TV series that followed it]]) and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, the colors are a lot duller, and the layouts and camera work are less cinematic and grand. It's especially pronounced compared to the original and its sweeping visuals, complex character animation, and use of digital techniques including [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects CGI]] and the CAPS painting method (neither of which were used here). That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality like with Madelaine's introduction, which comes down to Disney Japan's usual bouncy style; but winds up a detriment in and of itself as it makes everyone move as cartoonishly and rubbery as the gargoyles.

to:

** Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films going forward. The animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' (which can be excused for it being a pilot to [[WesternAnimation/AladdinTheSeries the TV series that followed it]]) and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''.''WesternAnimation/BellesMagicalWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, the colors are a lot duller, and the layouts and camera work are less cinematic and grand. It's especially pronounced compared to the original and its sweeping visuals, complex character animation, and use of digital techniques including [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects CGI]] and the CAPS painting method (neither of which were used here). That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality like with Madelaine's introduction, which comes down to Disney Japan's usual bouncy style; but winds up a detriment in and of itself as it makes everyone move as cartoonishly and rubbery as the gargoyles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One of the other messages, that prejudice is wrong, is also broken. Pheobus is portrayed as being in the wrong for his prejudice against carnies, and he says that he was wrong at the end. But he wasn't wrong; the carnies really ''were'' stealing from people, and Madellaine was the only exception, so his suspicions were entirely justified!

to:

** One of the other messages, that prejudice is wrong, is also broken. Pheobus Phoebus is portrayed as being in the wrong for his prejudice against carnies, and he says that he was wrong at the end. But he wasn't wrong; the carnies really ''were'' stealing from people, and Madellaine was the only exception, so his suspicions were entirely justified!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films going forward. The animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' (which can be excused for it being a pilot to [[WesternAnimation/AladdinTheSeries the TV series that followed it]]) and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, the colors are a lot duller, and the layouts and camera work are less cinematic and grand. It's especially pronounced compared to the original and its sweeping visuals, complex character animation, and use of digital techniques including [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects CGI]]. That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality, like with Madelaine's introduction. This comes down to Disney Japan's usual bouncy style; but winds up a detriment in and of itself as it makes everyone move as cartoonishly and rubbery as the gargoyles.

to:

** Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films going forward. The animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' (which can be excused for it being a pilot to [[WesternAnimation/AladdinTheSeries the TV series that followed it]]) and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, the colors are a lot duller, and the layouts and camera work are less cinematic and grand. It's especially pronounced compared to the original and its sweeping visuals, complex character animation, and use of digital techniques including [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects CGI]]. CGI]] and the CAPS painting method (neither of which were used here). That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality, quality like with Madelaine's introduction. This introduction, which comes down to Disney Japan's usual bouncy style; but winds up a detriment in and of itself as it makes everyone move as cartoonishly and rubbery as the gargoyles.

Added: 1106

Changed: 659

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtEvolution: Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films, the animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels, along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, and the colors are a lot more dull. It's especially pronounced compared to just how different the style is to the original. That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality, like with Madellaine's introduction.

to:

* ArtEvolution: ArtEvolution:
**
Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films, the films going forward. The animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels, sequels along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' (which can be excused for it being a pilot to [[WesternAnimation/AladdinTheSeries the TV series that followed it]]) and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, and the colors are a lot more dull. duller, and the layouts and camera work are less cinematic and grand. It's especially pronounced compared to just how different the style is to the original. original and its sweeping visuals, complex character animation, and use of digital techniques including [[TwoDVisualsThreeDEffects CGI]]. That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality, like with Madellaine's introduction.Madelaine's introduction. This comes down to Disney Japan's usual bouncy style; but winds up a detriment in and of itself as it makes everyone move as cartoonishly and rubbery as the gargoyles.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Also, this is the last Disney production to use hand-painted cel animation.

Added: 289

Changed: 104

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtEvolution: Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films, the animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels, along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. It's especially pronounced compared to just how different the style is to the original. That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality, like with Madellaine's introduction.

to:

* ArtEvolution: Inverted, big time. Despite coming out after ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKingIISimbasPride'', which set the standard for DTV Disney films, the animation in ''Hunchback II'' is usually considered to be some of the worst amongst the Disney sequels, along with ''WesternAnimation/AladdinTheReturnOfJafar'' and ''WesternAnimation/PocahontasIIJourneyToANewWorld''. The animation is not as fluid, Notre Dame has a much smaller scope, and the colors are a lot more dull. It's especially pronounced compared to just how different the style is to the original. That said, there are some moments of fluidity despite the lower quality, like with Madellaine's introduction.


Added DiffLines:

* NotAllowedToGrowUp: The little girl who was the first to walk up to Quasimodo at the end of the first movie makes a couple of cameos throughout the film. Despite the fact enough time has passed for Phoebus and Esmerelda to have a six-year old son, the little girl looks exactly the same.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InnocentlyInsensitive: When Phoebus tells his suspicions against Madellaine plotting to steal the La Fidele with Sarousch, Quasimodo asks if Phoebus thinks if anyone could love him for him. Phoebus immediately realizes his error and corrects what he means in a slightly more tactful manner.

to:

* InnocentlyInsensitive: When Phoebus tells his suspicions against suspects that Madellaine plotting to steal the is only using Quasimodo so she can get La Fidele with for Sarousch, Quasimodo asks if assumes that Phoebus thinks if anyone doesn't think someone could love him for him.his own merits. Phoebus immediately realizes his error and corrects what he means in a slightly more tactful manner.



* SissyVillain: Sarousch. He speaks in an effeminate way and is in love with himself.

to:

* SissyVillain: Sarousch. He Sarousch speaks in an effeminate way and manner, [[{{Narcissist}} is in love unhealthily obsessed with himself.himself]], and poses little to no physical threat, primarily relying on his thugs to do his bidding.
* SurprisinglyRealisticOutcome: Madellaine is established upfront as a NiceGirl, and during their first meeting, she genuinely gets along with Quasimodo while he speaks to her from the shadows. Despite this, she still runs away in horror after seeing his deformed appearance, and it takes her a while to get over her fear and try approaching him again.



* TimeSkip: The sequel takes place six years after the first film.

to:

* TimeSkip: The sequel takes place six years after the first film.film, mainly evidenced by Phoebus and Esmerelda now having a young son.
* TheUnfought: Unlike Frollo, Sarousch never physically engages the heroes in combat, [[spoiler:and he and his men are unable to resist when they're finally caught]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicked trope


* AdultFear: Zephyr's disappearance and Sarousch using him as a hostage.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* FootFocus: Madellaine's barefeet while she practices tightrope-walking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Made in 2000 [[TheShelfOfMovieLanguishment but not released until 2002]], this [[DirectToVideo direct-to-video]] {{sequel}} to Disney's 1996 blockbuster ''WesternAnimation/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame'' was produced by Creator/DisneytoonStudios.


to:

Made in 2000 [[TheShelfOfMovieLanguishment but not released until 2002]], this [[DirectToVideo direct-to-video]] {{sequel}} to Disney's 1996 blockbuster ''WesternAnimation/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame'' ''WesternAnimation/{{The Hunchback of Notre Dame|Disney}}'' was produced by Creator/DisneytoonStudios.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The 2002 [[DirectToVideo direct-to-video]] {{sequel}} to Disney's 1996 Franchise/DisneyAnimatedCanon film ''WesternAnimation/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame'', the film is produced by Creator/DisneytoonStudios.

to:

The 2002 Made in 2000 [[TheShelfOfMovieLanguishment but not released until 2002]], this [[DirectToVideo direct-to-video]] {{sequel}} to Disney's 1996 Franchise/DisneyAnimatedCanon film ''WesternAnimation/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame'', the film is blockbuster ''WesternAnimation/TheHunchbackOfNotreDame'' was produced by Creator/DisneytoonStudios.
Creator/DisneytoonStudios.

Added: 150

Changed: 597

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


%% * FauxAffablyEvil: Sarousch.

to:

%% * FauxAffablyEvil: Sarousch.Sarousch is a very charismatic and flamboyant performer, and for most of the film seems to be a far less threatening antagonist than his predecessor, Frollo. When Madellaine refuses to help him any further, he suddenly drops his charming façade and threatens to have Quasi killed. To say nothing of the climax, where he [[WouldHurtAChild takes Zephyr hostage]].



* {{Narcissist}}: Sarousch. Phoebus lampshades it after interrogating him: "I'll let you get back to... yourself."
* NoSongForTheWicked: Sarousch does not get a song. He gets so many chances for it too!

to:

* {{Narcissist}}: Sarousch. He spends most of his screentime admiring himself in his various mirrors, and Phoebus lampshades it after interrogating him: "I'll let you get back to... yourself."
* NoSongForTheWicked: Surprisingly, despite being far more flamboyant and dramatic than Frollo, and an actual performer in-universe, Sarousch does not get a song. He gets so many chances for it too!his own VillainSong.


Added DiffLines:

* WouldHurtAChild: When Zephyr is abducted, Madellaine warns Quasimodo that Sarousch won't hesitate to hurt or even kill the boy to get what he wants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DemotedToExtra: Clopin has a handful of quick cameos, and isn't involved in the film's plot in any way. His only main role seems to just be directing the love festival.

Added: 414

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicensePhysics: Two of Sarouch's men easily carry an adult elephant.



* FauxAffablyEvil: Sarousch.

to:

%% * FauxAffablyEvil: Sarousch.Sarousch.
* {{Foil}}: Madellaine is a positive example for Quasi. Both are clumsy and EndearinglyDorky people who have grown up with cruel father figures yet remain good people. Quasi however is a deformed man who has spent his life as a recluse in the bell tower, while Madellaine is a beautiful woman who has traveled the world with the circus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been reworked by TRS into Not So Different Remark


* NotSoDifferent: Quasi and Madellaine; both of them are clumsy and nice people who are dominated by evil father figures.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Phoebus:''' Yes!

to:

'''Phoebus:''' Yes!Yes!
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One of the other messages, that prejudice is wrong, is also broken. Pheobus is portrayed as being in the wrong for his prejudice against carnies, and he says that he was wrong at the end. But he wasn't wrong; the carnies really ''were'' stealing from people, and Madellaine was the only exception, so his suspicious were entirely justified!

to:

** One of the other messages, that prejudice is wrong, is also broken. Pheobus is portrayed as being in the wrong for his prejudice against carnies, and he says that he was wrong at the end. But he wasn't wrong; the carnies really ''were'' stealing from people, and Madellaine was the only exception, so his suspicious suspicions were entirely justified!

Top