Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / INeverSaidItWasPoison

Go To

OR

Added: 699

Changed: 183

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/TheCountOfMonteCristo2002'', Mercedes realizes that the mysterious Count really is Edmond when he tells her that "Edmond Dantes is dead." She had told him that her lover Edmond was dead, but not his last name.

to:

* In ''Film/TheCountOfMonteCristo2002'', ''Film/TheCountOfMonteCristo2002'':
**
Mercedes realizes that the mysterious Count really is Edmond when he tells her that "Edmond "[[ThatManIsDead Edmond Dantes is dead.dead]]." She had told him that her lover Edmond was dead, but not his last name.name.
** When Dantes faces [[AmoralAttorney Villefort, the prosecutor]] [[MiscarriageOfJustice that had him wrongfully sent to]] [[HellholePrison Chateau d'if]], he gets him to admit that he arranged his father's murder for being a Bonapartist in order to protect his own reputation.
--->'''Villefort:''' Mondego is the one who pulled the trigger! He'd never confess in a million years!
--->'''Dantes:''' You're right, he wouldn't. But you just have.
--->(''Dantes opens the curtains, revealing gendarmes'')
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/TotalDrama'': After Mal leaves Cameron hanging from a ledge, Alejandro later comes up and offers to rescue him, but Cameron declines. When Alejandro and Mal reunite (alongside others), Alejandro explains Cameron's absence, where Mal then accuses Alejandro of "leaving Cameron hanging there." However, as Alejandro points out in his ConfessionCam, he never said Cameron was ''hanging ''.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TotalDrama'': After Mal leaves Cameron hanging from a ledge, Alejandro later comes up and offers to rescue him, but Cameron declines. When Alejandro and Mal reunite (alongside others), Alejandro explains Cameron's absence, where Mal then accuses Alejandro of "leaving Cameron hanging there." However, as Alejandro points out in his ConfessionCam, he never said Cameron was ''hanging ''."hanging".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/TotalDrama'': After Mal leaves Cameron hanging from a ledge, Alejandro later comes up and offers to rescue him, but Cameron declines. When Alejandro and Mal reunite (alongside others), Alejandro explains Cameron's absence, where Mal then accuses Alejandro of "leaving Cameron hanging there." However, as Alejandro points out in his ConfessionCam, he never said Cameron was ''''"hanging" ''''.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TotalDrama'': After Mal leaves Cameron hanging from a ledge, Alejandro later comes up and offers to rescue him, but Cameron declines. When Alejandro and Mal reunite (alongside others), Alejandro explains Cameron's absence, where Mal then accuses Alejandro of "leaving Cameron hanging there." However, as Alejandro points out in his ConfessionCam, he never said Cameron was ''''"hanging" ''''.''hanging ''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''WesternAnimation/TotalDrama'': After Mal leaves Cameron hanging from a ledge, Alejandro later comes up and offers to rescue him, but Cameron declines. When Alejandro and Mal reunite (alongside others), Alejandro explains Cameron's absence, where Mal then accuses Alejandro of "leaving [Cameron] hanging there." However, as Alejandro points out in his ConfessionCam, he never said Cameron was hanging.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/TotalDrama'': After Mal leaves Cameron hanging from a ledge, Alejandro later comes up and offers to rescue him, but Cameron declines. When Alejandro and Mal reunite (alongside others), Alejandro explains Cameron's absence, where Mal then accuses Alejandro of "leaving [Cameron] Cameron hanging there." However, as Alejandro points out in his ConfessionCam, he never said Cameron was hanging.''''"hanging" ''''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Fanfic/{{Alicorn}}'': After Rainbow suffers one of her recurring nightmares, Luna asks if it was about her mother. Rainbow immediately objects that [[DisownedParent Celestia is not her mother]]. Luna, of course, didn't imply that she was, but Rainbow's kneejerk reaction told her what she wanted to know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** In Case 3, "Recipe for a Turnabout", this is done, ironically enough, by saying something was poison. Specifically, [[spoiler:Phoenix lies and says that a completely useless green plastic bottle (it contained ear medication used by the victim) that has Furio Tigre's fingerprints on it contained the poison used to kill the victim. Tigre laughs and calls Phoenix an idiot, since he should already know that the poison was in the ''brown glass'' bottle, not that one, so his evidence doesn't prove anything. And yes, Phoenix ''did'' already know that, as the bottles' contents had been established earlier in the trial. Thing is, Tigre hadn't been in the courtroom when the bottles were brought up, so the only way Tigre could've known which bottle contained the poison was if he'd ''used'' it]].

to:

*** In Case 3, "Recipe for a Turnabout", this is done, ironically enough, by saying something was poison. Specifically, [[spoiler:Phoenix lies and says that a completely useless green plastic bottle (it contained ear medication used by the victim) that has with Furio Tigre's fingerprints on it contained the poison used to kill the victim.victim (it atually contained the victim's ear medicine). Tigre laughs and calls Phoenix an idiot, since he should already know that the poison was in the ''brown glass'' bottle, not that one, so his evidence doesn't prove anything. And yes, Phoenix ''did'' already know that, as did everyone else in the courtroom, since both bottles' contents had been established earlier in the trial. Thing is, Tigre was only just recently summoned to court and hadn't been in the courtroom present when the bottles were brought up, so the only way Tigre he could've known which bottle contained the poison was if he'd ''used'' it]].

Added: 47

Changed: 28

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Infamously happened in a Series/JudgeJudy case [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rh9w-CYBcM about a stolen wallet]] (contrary to the video's title, the segment was actually the same length of a normal case). After the plaintiff was finished listing the items that were in the stolen wallet, one of the defendants piped up that there was no earpiece in the wallet... but he had to have stolen the wallet to ''know'' that.

to:

* Infamously happened in a Series/JudgeJudy case [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rh9w-CYBcM about a stolen wallet]] (contrary to the video's title, the segment was actually the same length of a normal case). After the plaintiff was finished listing the items that were in the stolen wallet, one of the defendants piped up that there was no earpiece in the wallet... but he had to have stolen the wallet to ''know'' that.that. Judy herself said it best:
-->"That's ''Film/DumbAndDumber'' right there."

Added: 696

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/OnTheStreetWhereYouLive'': While a police detective is interviewing Ned about why he showed up at Emily's house with a knife, Ned said he just wanted to see Emily look as frightened as his mother did before she was fatally stabbed (with Ned blaming Emily for getting the man charged with the murder acquitted). Something about the way Ned says it bothers the detective. [[spoiler:The detective digs deeper into why Ned knew what his mother's last expression was – especially as for all he knew she was caught off-guard and never saw her killer coming – and gets Ned to confess that ''he'' killed his mother, so he would've known exactly how his mother's final moments played out]].



* ''{{Literature/Spenser}}'' gets one of several hints the Stapleton family in ''Small Vices'' is lying about their son and his alleged non-involvement in the case Spenser has been hired to investigate when they specifically refer to it as a sex crime, since the fact that the victim was also murdered was far more likely to be of note to people who had supposedly only heard of it in passing. Their referring to it only a sex crime makes sense when, at the end of the book, [[spoiler:it's revealed it wasn't actually a murder--the victim and their son were playing a sex game involving EroticAsphyxiation and she accidentally died during it.]]

to:

* ''{{Literature/Spenser}}'' ''Literature/{{Spenser}}'' gets one of several hints the Stapleton family in ''Small Vices'' is lying about their son and his alleged non-involvement in the case Spenser has been hired to investigate when they specifically refer to it as a sex crime, since the fact that the victim was also murdered was far more likely to be of note to people who had supposedly only heard of it in passing. Their referring to it only a sex crime makes sense when, at the end of the book, [[spoiler:it's revealed it wasn't actually a murder--the victim and their son were playing a sex game involving EroticAsphyxiation and she accidentally died during it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not everyone would jump to the obvious conclusion (people who've played the game or seen a let's play, for a start), so "you'd" is better because it's more generic


*** In the first case, Shelly de Killer [[spoiler:refers to the victim by his full name during a cross-examination, while up until then Edgeworth had only ever referred to him by surname (and, in fact, didn't even ''know'' his first name until that point). It doesn't mean what you think it means, but it does reveal him as more connected to the case than he claims]].

to:

*** In the first case, Shelly de Killer [[spoiler:refers to the victim by his full name during a cross-examination, while up until then Edgeworth had only ever referred to him by surname (and, in fact, didn't even ''know'' his first name until that point). It doesn't mean what you you'd think it means, but it does reveal him as more connected to the case than he claims]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* ''Fanfic/DanganronpaKommSusserTod'': This is used in the final trial to expose [[spoiler:Sasuke Akechi]] as the mastermind -- it's pointed out that the mastermind made a very specific comment about the previous chapter's execution... before it happened, meaning that they only could've known about what the execution would entail if they had been the one to devise it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Fanfic/HarryPotterAndTheMagicOfTheBeasts'': When Harry and Steve return to the troll village after killing off all but Goyle Sr. upon finding out about evidence of a potential traitor in Lakjin's clan, the exchange between Harry, Lakjin and Tarvos happens.
--> '''Lakjin''': I recognize this crest, I lost a brother when we were younglings to these bastards, they attempted a raid 15 years ago on my village, many fell by my club before they fled.\\
'''Tarvos''': You're not seriously going to listen to this boy are you, [[SayingTooMuch the Goyles are true examples of trustworthy wizards.]]\\
'''Harry, thinking''': ''[[LampshadeHanging This guy's a fucking idiot, I didn't even give them the family name of these wizards yet, and something tells me no one here ever knew it.]]''\\
'''Lakjin''': Tarvos, if Devastator trusts this boy, then I will trust him as well... However... I would like to know ''HOW'' you knew the familial name of these wizards, when even ''I'' didn't know.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheWomanInTheWindow'': Played straight so often that it stops being suspenseful and becomes hilarious; the guilt-ridden professor lets slip every possible detail, including knowing the man was murdered (when the body hadn't turned up yet), knowing where the body was placed, that it happened at night, etc. His friends are so dense that they wave off every comment and never suspect him, but you would think he'd just learn to keep his mouth shut, especially when having casual conversations ''with the district attorney''.

to:

* ''Film/TheWomanInTheWindow'': ''Film/TheWomanInTheWindow1944'': Played straight so often that it stops being suspenseful and becomes hilarious; the guilt-ridden professor lets slip every possible detail, including knowing the man was murdered (when the body hadn't turned up yet), knowing where the body was placed, that it happened at night, etc. His friends are so dense that they wave off every comment and never suspect him, but you would think he'd just learn to keep his mouth shut, especially when having casual conversations ''with the district attorney''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A variation occurs in ''Literature/WhereAreTheChildren''; the anonymous newspaper article exposing Nancy's past mentions her children's bodies were found wearing red knitted sweaters with a white sailboat pattern. Jonathan, who has carefully studied the murder case, notes that the police never publicly released any details about the sweaters to assist with the investigation. While Nancy knew what the sweaters looked like as she'd knitted them and dressed the children in them the morning they died, Jonathan states that the author of the article knowing this detail suggests he was involved in the murders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Literature/HarryPotterAndTheChamberOfSecrets'': Dobby inadvertently reveals that he has been stopping Harry's letters when he mentions that Harry's friends haven't written to him -- which he should have no way of knowing.

to:

* ''Literature/HarryPotterAndTheChamberOfSecrets'': Dobby inadvertently reveals that he [[INeverGotAnyLetters has been stopping Harry's letters letters]] when he mentions that Harry's friends haven't written to him -- which he should have no way of knowing.



* As noted, police actually do rely on this as part of real life interrogation techniques. However, over-reliance on this technique has led to a significant number of false confessions and erroneous arrests. Police will either feed the suspect information he didn't know before and he'll repeat it back, and they'll use that to browbeat a confession out of him, or the suspect will make inferences that make it seem like he knows more about the crime than he really does (it's ''very'' easy to assume that the victim was shot in a murder case, for example - and if a suspect says many different things, the police can report only the inferences that were correct, making them sound incriminating out of context). This has caused police in some countries to abandon the technique entirely. There's also the issue that police can accidentally reveal their hand while doing so. If, for example, a detective tries to coerce a confession by saying that they found the suspect's fingerprints and the suspect wore gloves while committing the crime, they will know the police are bluffing and don't actually have any solid evidence.

to:

* As noted, police actually do rely on this as part of real life real-life interrogation techniques. However, over-reliance on this technique has led to a significant number of false confessions and erroneous arrests. Police will either feed the suspect information he didn't know before and he'll repeat it back, and they'll use that to browbeat a confession out of him, or the suspect will make inferences that make it seem like he knows more about the crime than he really does (it's ''very'' easy to assume that the victim was shot in a murder case, for example - and if a suspect says many different things, the police can report only the inferences that were correct, making them sound incriminating out of context). This has caused police in some countries to abandon the technique entirely. There's also the issue that police can accidentally reveal their hand while doing so. If, for example, a detective tries to coerce a confession by saying that they found the suspect's fingerprints and the suspect wore gloves while committing the crime, they will know the police are bluffing and don't actually have any solid evidence.



* An exaggerated version with New Zealand baby farmer John Makin. While awaiting trial, he had told his cellmate that the police could not prove he had poisoned any of the infants under his care. He was right. However, this was because the bodies were too decayed for a cause of death to be established, meaning that nobody other than Makin had ever suggested he had poisoned them.

to:

* An exaggerated version with New Zealand [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_farming baby farmer farmer]] John Makin. While awaiting trial, he had told his cellmate that the police could not prove he had poisoned any of the infants under his care. He was right. However, this was because the bodies were too decayed for a cause of death to be established, meaning that nobody other than Makin had ever suggested he had poisoned them.



Top