[005]
Aomic
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I'm starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e:
to:
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I\'m starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e: \"House Robots\", \"Grand finalists\", \"Semi-Finalists\", \"Heat Finalists\", \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\").
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a heat final\" (as ArcaneAzmadi originally came up with) or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every generally unsuccessful team like the \"Torque\" team in.
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a heat final\" (as ArcaneAzmadi originally came up with) or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every generally unsuccessful team like the \"Torque\" team in.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I'm starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e:
to:
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I\'m starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e: \"House Robots\", \"Grand finalists\", \"Semi-Finalists\", \"Heat Finalists\", \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\").
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a heat final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every generally unsuccessful team like the \"Torque\" team in.
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a heat final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every generally unsuccessful team like the \"Torque\" team in.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I'm starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e:
to:
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I\'m starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e: \"House Robots\", \"Grand finalists\", \"Semi-Finalists\", \"Heat Finalists\", \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\").
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a semi-final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every generally unsuccessful team like the \"Torque\" team in.
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a semi-final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every generally unsuccessful team like the \"Torque\" team in.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 robots alone residing on this one page. I'm starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e:
to:
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 (interesting and successful) robots alone residing on this one page. I\'m starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e: \"House Robots\", \"Grand finalists\", \"Semi-Finalists\", \"Heat Finalists\", \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\").
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a semi-final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every robot in.
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a semi-final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every robot in.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 robots alone residing on this one page. I'm starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e:
to:
This page is starting to get so unweldy from the LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters that even my high-end PC is having trouble loading the editing page, and there is the potential for over 100 robots alone residing on this one page. I\'m starting to think that we should organize this page differently; by splitting it into its own separate pages (i.e: \"House Robots\", \"Grand finalists\", \"Semi-Finalists\", \"Heat Finalists\", \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\").
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a semi-final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every robot in.
Each page is then organised by series (1-7, 2016- when broadcast) and in the case of the GF page, organised in order of how that robot finished that series with the winner at the top of each folder. Each robot is placed in the folder where they first appeared in their highest position (i.e Bigger Brother made the Grand Final in series 5 despite competing the previous 2 years, so it would go under the \"Grand Finalists\" page, \"Series 5\" folder, and under Razer, who won that series).
The \"Other Robots\" and \"Personnel\" page instead has folders for \"Notable UK Competitors/ Personnel\" and \"International Competitors/ Personnel\".
So what do you think? It can help organise this page better, and make it easier to find a competitor. Naturally, most possible future entrants on this page would have to adhere to the \"Entered 3 Wars + Made a semi-final\" or \"Reach 1 semi final\" to be considered for the page, so we aren\'t pressured into adding every robot in.
