[002]
ChrispAndChrisIce
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I\'m not sure it fits as a double standard either. The IronicEcho is all it was--an ironic echo. Decisions being agreed with or not isn\'t really good enough to call it a double standard--both of these men are in positions that apply power and require trust and the decision to depose Ozpin wasn\'t made by him. If Ironwood later starts to withhold information like Ozpin before him, or ends up being unable to stop a crisis his way, and \'\'still\'\' upholds the trust schtick, \'\'then\'\' it would be accurate to say he\'s holding a double standard. That makes sense, right?
to:
I\\\'m not sure it fits as a double standard either. The IronicEcho is all it was--an ironic echo. Decisions being agreed with or not isn\\\'t really good enough to call it a double standard--both of these men are in positions that apply power and require trust and the decision to depose Ozpin wasn\\\'t made by him. If Ironwood later starts to withhold information like Ozpin before him, or ends up being unable to stop a crisis his way, and \\\'\\\'still\\\'\\\' upholds the trust schtick, \\\'\\\'then\\\'\\\' it would be accurate to say he\\\'s holding a double standard. Right now though, it\\\'s too early because only now is Ironwood in the same position as Ozpin. That makes sense, right?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I\'m not sure it fits as a double standard either. The IronicEcho is all it was--an ironic echo. Decisions being agreed with or not isn\'t really good enough to call it a double standard--both of these men are in positions that apply power and require trust and the decision to depose Ozpin wasn\'t made by him. If Ironwood later starts to withhold information, or ends up being unable to stop a crisis and \'\'still\'\' upholds the trust schtick, \'\'then\'\' it would be accurate to say he\'s holding a double standard. That makes sense, right?
to:
I\\\'m not sure it fits as a double standard either. The IronicEcho is all it was--an ironic echo. Decisions being agreed with or not isn\\\'t really good enough to call it a double standard--both of these men are in positions that apply power and require trust and the decision to depose Ozpin wasn\\\'t made by him. If Ironwood later starts to withhold information like Ozpin before him, or ends up being unable to stop a crisis his way, and \\\'\\\'still\\\'\\\' upholds the trust schtick, \\\'\\\'then\\\'\\\' it would be accurate to say he\\\'s holding a double standard. That makes sense, right?
