[004]
StudiodeKadent
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When the page was unlocked, I added under \
to:
When the page was unlocked, I added under \\\"FanDisillusionment\\\" that Progressives were unhappy with the healthcare reforms and considered them Corporatism. I\\\'d like to add that libertarians (ideologically speaking, not just members of the Libertarian Party) were also unhappy with the outcome of the healthcare reforms for \\\'\\\'exactly the same reason\\\'\\\' (i.e. that the bill was Corporatist).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" or \\\"good\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDisillusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" or \\\"good\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDisillusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When the page was unlocked, I added under \
to:
When the page was unlocked, I added under \\\"FanDisillusionment\\\" that Progressives were unhappy with the healthcare reforms and considered them Corporatism. I\\\'d like to add that libertarians (ideologically speaking, not just members of the Libertarian Party) were also unhappy with the outcome of the healthcare reforms for \\\'\\\'exactly the same reason\\\'\\\' (i.e. that the bill was Corporatist).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDisilusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDisilusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When the page was unlocked, I added under \
to:
When the page was unlocked, I added under \\\"FanDisillusionment\\\" that Progressives were unhappy with the healthcare reforms and considered them Corporatism. I\\\'d like to add that libertarians (ideologically speaking, not just members of the Libertarian Party) were also unhappy with the outcome of the healthcare reforms for \\\'\\\'exactly the same reason\\\'\\\' (i.e. that the bill was Corporatist).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDissilusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDissilusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When the page was unlocked, I added under \
to:
When the page was unlocked, I added under \\\"FanDisillusionment\\\" that Progressives were unhappy with the healthcare reforms and considered them Corporatism. I\\\'d like to add that libertarians (ideologically speaking, not just members of the Libertarian Party) were also unhappy with the outcome of the healthcare reforms for \\\'\\\'exactly the same reason\\\'\\\' (i.e. that the bill was Corporatist)).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDissilusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
I am a libertarian but this isn\\\'t a biased edit. There is nothing \\\"wrong\\\" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as \\\"fans\\\" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under \\\"FanDissilusionment\\\" where it reads:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
*The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see \\\"Golden Mean Fallacy\\\" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
