[001]
BritBllt
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Just because the wording didn\'t swear or call names doesn\'t make it mild. Censorship is a strong accusation. The Sonichu page was a huge debacle, to even make the comparison speaks volumes. To feel \
to:
Just because the wording didn\\\'t swear or call names doesn\\\'t make it mild. Censorship is a strong accusation. The Sonichu page was a huge debacle, to even make the comparison speaks volumes. To feel very frustrated over a day-long inability to add one specific edit is a surprisingly strong reaction. And the only reason I can see for such a thing is that people want to vent their negative opinions (or more specifically, want to experience the \\\"I told so you\\\" validation). Because, otherwise, where is this collective impetus to post that score coming from, and why does it exist on this page and virtually no other movie page on TV Tropes?
As for me, I\\\'m in this for an emotional reason too. I like the positive tone TV Tropes used to have, and I hate seeing it slowly giving way to negativity. Frankly, if I want to go read about how horrible any particular work is, there\\\'s the entire rest of the internet, in scathing technicolor vitriol. What makes TV Tropes different is how accepting and positive it generally is. Most of the works pages I\\\'ve seen, including some really bad ones, don\\\'t offer any comment about the reception at all, at least not in the main text. So why cite it on this one, and why the urgency and sense of unfairness in not being able to do so?
As for me, I\\\'m in this for an emotional reason too. I like the positive tone TV Tropes used to have, and I hate seeing it slowly giving way to negativity. Frankly, if I want to go read about how horrible any particular work is, there\\\'s the entire rest of the internet, in scathing technicolor vitriol. What makes TV Tropes different is how accepting and positive it generally is. Most of the works pages I\\\'ve seen, including some really bad ones, don\\\'t offer any comment about the reception at all, at least not in the main text. So why cite it on this one, and why the urgency and sense of unfairness in not being able to do so?
