Discussion History Film / TheLastAirbender

\\\"Are your fingers so itching to bash this movie that the effort of holding back for at least the opening weekend to pass is too much to bear?\\\"

You said that in your original post.

In my post proceeding that, I ask exactly where people said or implied that was the case.

You then cite five \\\'\\\'mild\\\'\\\' posts responding to the censorship and issues arising from that.

I point out that those do not show the desires you implied people had in your original post. In my previous post, I compared the tone of a response to your hypothetical tone/action to demonstrate this discrepensy.

I feel we are on completely different pages here. Where are you in this argument?


EDIT: So wait, you were talking about the language being over the top, while I was arguing that your [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment language regarding the language being over the top was over the top]]?

Well, I feel adknowledging the fact that reception was clearly negative is not over the top and is silly to leave out, regardless of the timeframe, but at this point I think we\\\'ll have to agree to disagree and move on.

\\\"Are your fingers so itching to bash this movie that the effort of holding back for at least the opening weekend to pass is too much to bear?\\\"

You said that in your original post.

In my post proceeding that, I ask exactly where people said or implied that was the case.

You then cite five \\\'\\\'mild\\\'\\\' posts responding to the censorship and issues arising from that.

I point out that those do not show the desires you implied people had in your original post. In my previous post, I compared the tone of a response to your hypothetical tone/action to demonstrate this discrepensy.

I feel we are on completely different pages here. Where are you in this argument?


EDIT: So wait, you were talking about the language being over the top, while I was arguing that your [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment language regarding the language being over the top was over the top]]?

Well, I feel adknowledging the fact that reception was clearly negative is not over the top and is silly to leave out, but at this point I think we\\\'ll have to agree to disagree and move on.

\\\"Are your fingers so itching to bash this movie that the effort of holding back for at least the opening weekend to pass is too much to bear?\\\"

You said that in your original post.

In my post proceeding that, I ask exactly where people said or implied that was the case.

You then cite five \\\'\\\'mild\\\'\\\' posts responding to the censorship and issues arising from that.

I point out that those do not show the desires you implied people had in your original post. In my previous post, I compared the tone of a response to your hypothetical tone/action to demonstrate this discrepensy.

I feel we are on completely different pages here. Where are you in this argument?


EDIT: So you were talking about the language being over the top, while I was arguing that your [[DepartmentOfRedundancyDepartment language regarding the language being over the top was over the top]]?

\\\"Are your fingers so itching to bash this movie that the effort of holding back for at least the opening weekend to pass is too much to bear?\\\"

You said that in your original post.

In my post proceeding that, I ask exactly where people said or implied that was the case.

You then cite five \\\'\\\'mild\\\'\\\' posts responding to the censorship and issues arising from that.

I point out that those do not show the desires you implied people had in your original post. In my previous post, I compared the tone of a response to your hypothetical tone/action to demonstrate this discrepensy.

I feel we are on completely different pages here. Where are you in this argument?


EDIT: So you were talking about the language being over the top, while I was arguing that your [[DepartmentofRedunancyDepartment language regarding the language being over the top was over the top]]?

\\\"Are your fingers so itching to bash this movie that the effort of holding back for at least the opening weekend to pass is too much to bear?\\\"

You said that in your original post.

In my post proceeding that, I ask exactly where people said or implied that was the case.

You then cite five \\\'\\\'mild\\\'\\\' posts responding to the censorship and issues arising from that.

I point out that those do not show the desires you implied people had in your original post. In my previous post, I compared the tone of a response to your hypothetical tone/action to demonstrate this discrepensy.

I feel we are on completely different pages here. Where are you in this argument?