[004]
98.212.158.166
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. Someone posted a screenshot showing he\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent messages. Further investigation did not show anything that other people had been blocked, they simply claimed they had. No, there wasn\'t proof of a mass-ban over a hashtag. Several like-minded people went \
to:
1. Someone posted a screenshot showing he\\\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent messages. Further investigation did not show anything that other people had been blocked, they simply claimed they had. No, there wasn\\\'t proof of a mass-ban over a hashtag. Several like-minded people went \\\"me too, totally, get her guys\\\" and had people take their word for it despite failing to provide any solid proof whatsoever.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent events in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent events in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. Someone posted a screenshot showing he\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent messages. Further investigation did not show anything that other people had been blocked, they simply claimed they had. No, there wasn\'t proof of a mass-ban over a hashtag. Several like-minded people went \
to:
1. Someone posted a screenshot showing he\\\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent messages. Further investigation did not show anything that other people had been blocked, they simply claimed they had. No, there wasn\\\'t proof of a mass-ban over a hashtag. Several like-minded people went \\\"me too, totally, get her guys\\\" and had people take their word for it despite failing to provide any solid proof whatsoever.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent eventing in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent eventing in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. Someone posted a screenshot was posted showing he\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent them messages. Further investigation did not show anything of the sort. Several like-minded people went \
to:
1. Someone posted a screenshot showing he\\\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent messages. Further investigation did not show anything that other people had been blocked, they simply claimed they had. No, there wasn\\\'t proof of a mass-ban over a hashtag. Several like-minded people went \\\"me too, totally, get her guys\\\" and had people take their word for it despite any proof whatsoever.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent eventing in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent eventing in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
1. Someone posted a screenshot was posted showing he\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent them messages. Further investigation did not show anything of the sort. Several like-minded people went \
to:
1. Someone posted a screenshot was posted showing he\\\'d been blocked. He did not post proof he had never sent them messages. Further investigation did not show anything of the sort. Several like-minded people went \\\"me too, totally\\\" and had people take their word for it despite any proof whatsoever.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent eventing in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
2. Karam was not \\\"questioned about it\\\" in the way you\\\'re implying. People pointed to some tweets she\\\'d made about recent eventing in gaming and concluded they were evidence enough that A. all the supposed blocks had happened, B. she\\\'s in charge of administering blocks, and C. the claims about being blocked over hashtags were true. No actual evidence was provided.
3. She has indeed expressed support for those people. Those on the other side of recent issues have expressed interest in ethical factchecking. No factchecking is going on here. Claims are being taken as factual statements by people who want to believe the claims are true.
