[002]
193.153.199.205
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Bulbapedia is far from objective or well sourced, tho, and I wouldn\'t really use it as a source (Serebii offers the same objective data with far more efficience anyway). And, in any case, they are just avatars in pretty much the same game.
to:
Bulbapedia is far from objective or well sourced, tho, and I wouldn\\\'t really use it as a source for some things (Serebii offers the same objective data with far more efficience anyway). And, in any case, they are just avatars in pretty much the same game.
In fact, Bulbapedia is far less objective in some stuff than TV Tropes, even with those discussions going on. And to see the most popular wiki having more fandom-derived stuff in its main articles than TV Tropes, is kinda odd.
In fact, Bulbapedia is far less objective in some stuff than TV Tropes, even with those discussions going on. And to see the most popular wiki having more fandom-derived stuff in its main articles than TV Tropes, is kinda odd.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Bulbapedia is far from objective or well source, tho, and I wouldn\'t really use it as a source (Serebii offers the same objective data with far more efficience anyway). And, in any case, they are just avatars in pretty much the same game.
to:
Bulbapedia is far from objective or well sourced, tho, and I wouldn\\\'t really use it as a source (Serebii offers the same objective data with far more efficience anyway). And, in any case, they are just avatars in pretty much the same game.
