[002]
99.0.114.74
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I \'\'don\'t\'\' think they\'re arguable, I was being conciliatory. Saying \
to:
I \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' think they\\\'re arguable, I was being conciliatory. Saying \\\"They can be seen that way\\\" is more polite than saying \\\"Shut up, you\\\'re wrong\\\". Nowhere on the actual example does it ever say that it\\\'s an arguable case of this trope.
The first three \\\'\\\'Harry Potter\\\'\\\' books are not a trilogy because the third book ends with a clear sequel hook, and left several plot points unresolved for later installments to tie up. The first two \\\'\\\'Arkham\\\'\\\' games did not--they were written to stand on their own, while leaving room for future games. Television seasons work completely differently than that; a television \\\'\\\'episode\\\'\\\' is a single installment, not a television \\\'\\\'season\\\'\\\'.
The \\\'\\\'Pikmin\\\'\\\' games have nothing to do with this discussion. The point is, you\\\'re currently outvoted by one. Unless there\\\'s someone else out there who\\\'s willing to argue in favor of keeping this example off, I really don\\\'t see a compelling reason why it should be.
Please, don\\\'t take this so personally. I\\\'m just earnestly saying what I believe.
There\\\'s a reason why I didn\\\'t fight you the last time that you removed one of my examples. That time, I think you were right; this time, I\\\'m not so convinced.
The first three \\\'\\\'Harry Potter\\\'\\\' books are not a trilogy because the third book ends with a clear sequel hook, and left several plot points unresolved for later installments to tie up. The first two \\\'\\\'Arkham\\\'\\\' games did not--they were written to stand on their own, while leaving room for future games. Television seasons work completely differently than that; a television \\\'\\\'episode\\\'\\\' is a single installment, not a television \\\'\\\'season\\\'\\\'.
The \\\'\\\'Pikmin\\\'\\\' games have nothing to do with this discussion. The point is, you\\\'re currently outvoted by one. Unless there\\\'s someone else out there who\\\'s willing to argue in favor of keeping this example off, I really don\\\'t see a compelling reason why it should be.
Please, don\\\'t take this so personally. I\\\'m just earnestly saying what I believe.
There\\\'s a reason why I didn\\\'t fight you the last time that you removed one of my examples. That time, I think you were right; this time, I\\\'m not so convinced.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I \'\'don\'t\'\' think they\'re arguable, I was being conciliatory. Saying \
to:
I \\\'\\\'don\\\'t\\\'\\\' think they\\\'re arguable, I was being conciliatory. Saying \\\"They can be seen as a trilogy\\\" is more polite than saying \\\"Shut up, you\\\'re wrong\\\". Nowhere on the actual example does it ever say that it\\\'s an arguable case of this trope.
The first three \\\'\\\'Harry Potter\\\'\\\' books are not a trilogy because the third book ends with a clear sequel hook, and left several plot points unresolved for later installments to tie up. The first two \\\'\\\'Arkham\\\'\\\' games did not--they were written to stand on their own, while leaving room for future games. Television seasons work completely differently than that; a television \\\'\\\'episode\\\'\\\' is a single installment, not a television \\\'\\\'season\\\'\\\'.
The \\\'\\\'Pikmin\\\'\\\' games have nothing to do with this discussion. The point is, you\\\'re currently outvoted by one. Unless there\\\'s someone else out there who\\\'s willing to argue in favor of keeping this example off, I really don\\\'t see a compelling reason why it should be.
Please, don\\\'t take this so personally. I\\\'m just earnestly saying what I believe.
There\\\'s a reason why I didn\\\'t fight you the last time that you removed one of my examples. That time, I think you were right; this time, I\\\'m not so convinced.
The first three \\\'\\\'Harry Potter\\\'\\\' books are not a trilogy because the third book ends with a clear sequel hook, and left several plot points unresolved for later installments to tie up. The first two \\\'\\\'Arkham\\\'\\\' games did not--they were written to stand on their own, while leaving room for future games. Television seasons work completely differently than that; a television \\\'\\\'episode\\\'\\\' is a single installment, not a television \\\'\\\'season\\\'\\\'.
The \\\'\\\'Pikmin\\\'\\\' games have nothing to do with this discussion. The point is, you\\\'re currently outvoted by one. Unless there\\\'s someone else out there who\\\'s willing to argue in favor of keeping this example off, I really don\\\'t see a compelling reason why it should be.
Please, don\\\'t take this so personally. I\\\'m just earnestly saying what I believe.
There\\\'s a reason why I didn\\\'t fight you the last time that you removed one of my examples. That time, I think you were right; this time, I\\\'m not so convinced.
