[004]
75.182.67.118
Current Version
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
Oh, \'\'come on\'\'! Read the requirements, people! This item fails \'\'two\'\' of them. First, the use of the Golden Snitch to win Quidditch matches is not \
to:
Oh, \\\'\\\'come on\\\'\\\'! Read the requirements, people! This item fails \\\'\\\'two\\\'\\\' of them. First, the use of the Golden Snitch to win Quidditch matches is not \\\"sudden or unexpected\\\". The Snitch has been part of the game for \\\'\\\'centuries\\\'\\\', and every team has a player (the Seeker) whose \\\'\\\'only purpose\\\'\\\' is to pursue and capture it. Second, winning Quidditch matches is not an \\\"unsolvable or hopeless\\\" problem.
If you think the rules of Quidditch are ridiculously flawed, that\\\'s fine -- in fact, I agree with you. But this article is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' the place to complain about it. Item deleted.
If you think the rules of Quidditch are ridiculously flawed, that\\\'s fine -- in fact, I agree with you. But this article is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' the place to complain about it. Item deleted.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
Oh, \'\'come on\'\'! Read the requirements, people! This item fails \'\'two\'\' of them. First, the use of the Golden Snitch to win Quidditch matches is not \
to:
Oh, \\\'\\\'come on\\\'\\\'! Read the requirements, people! This item fails \\\'\\\'two\\\'\\\' of them. First, the use of the Golden Snitch to win Quidditch matches is not \\\"sudden or unexpected\\\". The Snitch has been part of the game for \\\'\\\'centuries\\\'\\\', and every team has a player (the Seeker) whose \\\'\\\'only purpose\\\'\\\' is to pursue and capture it. Second, winning Quidditch matches is not an \\\'\\\'unsolvable or hopeless\\\'\\\' problem.
If you think the rules of Quidditch are ridiculously flawed, that\\\'s fine -- in fact, I agree with you. But this article is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' the place to complain about it. Item deleted.
If you think the rules of Quidditch are ridiculously flawed, that\\\'s fine -- in fact, I agree with you. But this article is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' the place to complain about it. Item deleted.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
Oh, \'\'come on\'\'! Read the requirements, people! This item fails \'\'two\'\' of them. First, the use of the Golden Snitch to win Quidditch matches is not \
to:
Oh, \\\'\\\'come on\\\'\\\'! Read the requirements, people! This item fails \\\'\\\'two\\\'\\\' of them. First, the use of the Golden Snitch to win Quidditch matches is not \\\"sudden or unexpected\\\". The Snitch has been part of the game for \\\'\\\'centuries\\\'\\\', and every team has a player (the Seeker) whose \\\'\\\'only purpose\\\'\\\' is to pursue and capture it. Second, winning Quidditch matches is not an \\\'\\\'unsolvable or hopeless\\\'\\\' problem.
If you think the rules of Quidditch are ridiculously flawed, that\\\'s fine -- in fact, I agree with you. But this article is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' the place to complain about it.
If you think the rules of Quidditch are ridiculously flawed, that\\\'s fine -- in fact, I agree with you. But this article is \\\'\\\'\\\'not\\\'\\\'\\\' the place to complain about it.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Is there a link?
to:
Is there a link?
EDIT: To the developing PDF, I mean.
EDIT: To the developing PDF, I mean.
