[002]
144.92.195.117
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
At which point then I have to question the addition of the Norse Theory to the character page as well. It\'s plausible, but just like it\'s counterparts it doesn\'t have anything conclusive to it that isn\'t fan speculation. The only thing it has is that \
to:
At which point then I have to question the addition of the Norse Theory to the character page as well. It\\\'s plausible, but just like it\\\'s counterparts it doesn\\\'t have anything conclusive to it that isn\\\'t fan speculation. The only thing it has is that \\\"it\\\'s popular,\\\" which doesn\\\'t make it anymore accurate.
It\\\'s a double standard to allow one theory into the character page and yet reject another regardless of its potential feasibility as well.
It\\\'s a double standard to allow one theory into the character page and yet reject another regardless of its potential feasibility as well.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
At which point then I have to question the addition of the Norse Theory to the character page as well. It\'s plausible, but just like it\'s counterparts it doesn\'t have anything conclusive to it that isn\'t fan speculation. The only thing it has is that \
to:
At which point then I have to question the addition of the Norse Theory to the character page as well. It\\\'s plausible, but just like it\\\'s counterparts it doesn\\\'t have anything conclusive to it that isn\\\'t fan speculation. The only thing it has is that \\\"it\\\'s popular,\\\" which doesn\\\'t make it anymore accurate.
It\\\'s a double standard to allow one theory into the character page and yet reject another when it\\\'s just as feasible.
It\\\'s a double standard to allow one theory into the character page and yet reject another when it\\\'s just as feasible.
