[003]
108.218.233.34
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Removing this; it\'s already been attempted below.
to:
I know this is discussed below, but it seems like from the last ten edits most of the additions at this point still boil down to complaints about the work.
Could we maybe get a bit more self-editing on the phrasing and length of the example text so that the default state isn\\\'t openly talking about how much the characters are badly-written and the story sucks? That pretty explicitly shouldn\\\'t go in a non-YMMV article. There\\\'s still a review section if you just want to completely let loose on the comic.
It also seems like there\\\'s a little too much of a pattern of finding tropes that discuss how a character is a bad person (or similar issue) despite the author\\\'s intended portrayal, which seems like it goes against the spirit of writing an objective article even if it follows the rules indicated by the trope descriptions themselves. Say, someone \\\'\\\'could\\\'\\\' conceivably justify putting Kazuo in as a DirtyCoward for not confronting Makoto directly toward the ending, but this interpretation would obviously come from the bias of a specific reader.
Could we maybe get a bit more self-editing on the phrasing and length of the example text so that the default state isn\\\'t openly talking about how much the characters are badly-written and the story sucks? That pretty explicitly shouldn\\\'t go in a non-YMMV article. There\\\'s still a review section if you just want to completely let loose on the comic.
It also seems like there\\\'s a little too much of a pattern of finding tropes that discuss how a character is a bad person (or similar issue) despite the author\\\'s intended portrayal, which seems like it goes against the spirit of writing an objective article even if it follows the rules indicated by the trope descriptions themselves. Say, someone \\\'\\\'could\\\'\\\' conceivably justify putting Kazuo in as a DirtyCoward for not confronting Makoto directly toward the ending, but this interpretation would obviously come from the bias of a specific reader.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Removing this; it\'s already been attempted unsuccessfully.
to:
Removing this; it\\\'s already been attempted below.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In the last ten edits, it looks like every one has either contained a specific complaint about the work/characters or been a modification to such a complaint.
Could we maybe get a bit more self-editing on the phrasing and length of the example text so that the default state isn\'t openly talking about how much the characters are badly-written and the story sucks? That pretty explicitly does not belong as part of a non-YMMV article. There\'s still a review section if you just want to completely let loose on the comic.
It also seems like there\'s a little too much of a pattern of finding tropes that discuss how a character is a bad person (or similar issue) despite the author\'s intended portrayal, which seems like it goes against the spirit of writing an objective article even if it follows the rules indicated by the trope descriptions themselves. Say, someone \'\'could\'\' conceivably justify putting Kazuo in as a DirtyCoward for not confronting Makoto directly toward the ending, but this interpretation would obviously come from the bias of a specific reader.
Could we maybe get a bit more self-editing on the phrasing and length of the example text so that the default state isn\'t openly talking about how much the characters are badly-written and the story sucks? That pretty explicitly does not belong as part of a non-YMMV article. There\'s still a review section if you just want to completely let loose on the comic.
It also seems like there\'s a little too much of a pattern of finding tropes that discuss how a character is a bad person (or similar issue) despite the author\'s intended portrayal, which seems like it goes against the spirit of writing an objective article even if it follows the rules indicated by the trope descriptions themselves. Say, someone \'\'could\'\' conceivably justify putting Kazuo in as a DirtyCoward for not confronting Makoto directly toward the ending, but this interpretation would obviously come from the bias of a specific reader.
to:
Removing this; it\\\'s already been attempted unsuccessfully.
