Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / ProtagonistCenteredMorality

Go To

Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
Also, he changed his mind because he wasn\'t 100% an ass - he got owned and owned literally by the granddaughter of a woman he legitimately loved who left him because of the sexism he supported within his own society. It\'s called \
to:
Also, he changed his mind because he wasn\\\'t 100% an ass - he got owned and owned literally by the granddaughter of a woman he legitimately loved who left him because of the sexism he supported within his own society. It\\\'s called \\\"Character Development.\\\" Holy crap, Zuko is an example by this standard.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Katara was 100% in the right, not because she is the protagonist, but because sexism isn\'t right. Hitting the guy in the head and forcing him to fight her was the only way to even make him acknowledge her. This was the \'\'only way\'\'. That should be painfully obvious. Why is this even in debate unless we\'re simply going to declare that any time someone does something that agrees with the protagonist, the morality is Protagonist Centered?
to:
Katara was 100% in the right, not because she is the protagonist, but because sexism isn\\\'t right. Hitting the guy in the head and forcing him to fight her was the only way to even make him acknowledge her. This was the \\\'\\\'only way\\\'\\\'. That should be painfully obvious. Why is this even in debate unless we\\\'re simply going to declare that any time someone does something that agrees with the protagonist, the morality is Protagonist Centered?

Also, he changed his mind because he wasn\\\'t 100% an ass - he got owned and owned literally by the granddaughter of a woman he legitimately loved who left him because of the sexism he supported within his own society. It\\\'s called \\\"Character Development.\\\" Holy crap, Zuko is an example by this trope\\\'s standard.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Seriously.
to:
Seriously.

Katara was 100% in the right, not because she is the protagonist, but because sexism isn\\\'t right. Hitting the guy in the head and forcing him to fight her was the only way to even make him acknowledge her. This was the \\\'\\\'only way\\\'\\\'. That should be painfully obvious. Why is this even in debate unless we\\\'re simply going to declare that any time someone does something that agrees with the protagonist, the morality is Protagonist Centered?
Top