[003]
69.172.221.8
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Many of the Star Trek continuity errors described in the article are not Series Continuity Errors at all, but just a case of the series ignoring non-canon literature like the Spaceflight Chronology and the FASA RPG, which both claimed that the original five-year mission took place in the 2210s instead of the 2260s, despite no onscreen evidence. Also, there\'s no such thing as \
to:
Many of the Star Trek continuity errors described in the article are not Series Continuity Errors at all, but just a case of the series ignoring non-canon literature like the Spaceflight Chronology and the FASA RPG, which both claimed that the original five-year mission took place in the 2210s instead of the 2260s, despite no onscreen evidence. Also, there\\\'s no such thing as \\\"Roddenberry\\\'s Baton Rouge class\\\". The Baton Rouge class first appeared in the Spaceflight Chronology, which was not written by Gene Roddenberry.
The Star Trek Encyclopedia claimed that first contact with the Klingons happened in 2218, but this was never actually mentioned in any episode, so Enterprise was free to contact them in 2151 without causing any problems.
I\\\'ve deleted the first few Star Trek examples.
The Star Trek Encyclopedia claimed that first contact with the Klingons happened in 2218, but this was never actually mentioned in any episode, so Enterprise was free to contact them in 2151 without causing any problems.
I\\\'ve deleted the first few Star Trek examples.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Many of the Star Trek continuity errors described in the article are not Series Continuity Errors at all, but just a case of the series ignoring non-canon literature like the Spaceflight Chronology and the FASA RPG, which both claimed that the original five-year mission took place in the 2210s.
to:
Many of the Star Trek continuity errors described in the article are not Series Continuity Errors at all, but just a case of the series ignoring non-canon literature like the Spaceflight Chronology and the FASA RPG, which both claimed that the original five-year mission took place in the 2210s instead of the 2260s, despite no onscreen evidence. Also, there\\\'s no such thing as \\\"Roddenberry\\\'s Baton Rouge class\\\". The Baton Rouge class first appeared in the Spaceflight Chronology, which was not written by Gene Roddenberry.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
I\'m not sure what the protocol here is. Should I just delete those entries or should I write a comment explaining that they don\'t really fit this trope.
to:
I\\\'m not sure what the protocol here is. Should I just delete those entries or should I write a comment explaining that they don\\\'t really fit this trope?
