[004]
216.99.32.43
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That\'s the big issue. I don\'t believe Katara was portrayed as right because she\'s a main character. I believe she was portrayed as right because a lot of people, including myself and apparently including the writers for the show as well, believe that bullies need to get punched. In other words, the \
to:
That\\\'s the big issue. I don\\\'t believe Katara was portrayed as right because she\\\'s a main character. I believe she was portrayed as right because a lot of people, including myself and apparently including the writers for the show as well, believe that bullies need to be stopped, even if that means punching them a few times. In other words, the \\\"objective\\\" morals that you claim the show violated for the benefit of a main character are not quite so objective or widely held as you think.
Because of that, I think the example works much better as ValuesDissonance, rather than as ProtagonistCenteredMorality.
Because of that, I think the example works much better as ValuesDissonance, rather than as ProtagonistCenteredMorality.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
That\'s the thing, though. I don\'t say that she was wrong. As someone who was bullied as a child, I don\'t see anything wrong with standing up for yourself against a bully, or with using violence as long as you don\'t take it too far. (For example, I would agree that school shootings are absolutely wrong. Giving a bully a bloody nose, however, is something I would agree with.) Violence is not automatically bad. Violence is a tool, it\'s all in how you use it, and it\'s not like Katara was trying to actually \'\'kill\'\' or even seriously injure Pakku.
to:
That\\\'s the thing, though. I don\\\'t say that she was wrong. As someone who was bullied as a child, and who was only able to finally put a stop to it by kicking a few butts, I don\\\'t see anything wrong with standing up for yourself against a bully, or with using violence as long as you don\\\'t take it too far. (For example, I would agree that school shootings are absolutely wrong. Giving a bully a bloody nose, however, is something I would agree with.) Violence is not automatically bad. Violence is a tool, it\\\'s all in how you use it, and it\\\'s not like Katara was trying to actually \\\'\\\'kill\\\'\\\' or even seriously injure Pakku.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
That\'s the big issue. I don\'t believe Katara was portrayed as right because she\'s a main character. I believe she was portrayed as right because a lot of people, including myself and apparently including the writers for the show as well, believe that bullies need to get punched. In other words, the \
to:
That\\\'s the big issue. I don\\\'t believe Katara was portrayed as right because she\\\'s a main character. I believe she was portrayed as right because a lot of people, including myself and apparently including the writers for the show as well, believe that bullies need to get punched. In other words, the \\\"objective\\\" morals that you claim the show violated for the benefit of a main character are not quite so objective or widely held as you think.
Because of that, I think the example works much better as ValuesDissonance, rather than as ProtagonistCenteredMorality.
Because of that, I think the example works much better as ValuesDissonance, rather than as ProtagonistCenteredMorality.
