Discussion History VideoGame / MadFather

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to..I\\\'m not entirely sure why. But I think it\\\'s just not cool to delete other people\\\'s entries without good reason. Some of the changes are arbitrary, and some are just singular opinions. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. I think it\\\'s really nasty to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. Either it fits, is a subversion, or an aversion. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. And was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries that were added too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is a very shaky, subjective opinion, and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there.

Those are just some smaller changes. Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up and/or reverse the entry deletions? A lot of the changes seem arbitrary, heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material, seemingly at whim. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entries according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective on a trope that\\\'s already so complicated, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result. It really comes off like someone imposing OpinionMyopia, and according to a very shaky, subjective, personal definition of this trope. Full overhauls should be done with more caution than was used here, regardless of how well-versed the user(s) thought they were in the trope.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to..I\\\'m not entirely sure why. But I think it\\\'s just not cool to delete other people\\\'s entries without good reason. Some of the changes are arbitrary, and some are just singular opinions. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. I think it\\\'s really nasty to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. Either it fits, is a subversion, or an aversion. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is a very shaky, subjective opinion, and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there.

Those are just some smaller changes. Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up and/or reverse the entry deletions? A lot of the changes seem arbitrary, heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material, seemingly at whim. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entries according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective on a trope that\\\'s already so complicated, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result. It really comes off like someone imposing OpinionMyopia, and according to a very shaky, subjective, personal definition of this trope. Full overhauls should be done with more caution than was used here, regardless of how well-versed the user(s) thought they were in the trope.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to..I\\\'m not entirely sure why. But I think it\\\'s just not cool to delete other people\\\'s entries without good reason. Some of the changes are arbitrary, and some are just singular opinions. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. Either it fits, is a subversion, or an aversion. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is a very shaky, subjective opinion, and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there.

Those are just some smaller changes. Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up and/or reverse the entry deletions? A lot of the changes seem arbitrary, heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material, seemingly at whim. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entries according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective on a trope that\\\'s already so complicated, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result. It really comes off like someone imposing OpinionMyopia, and according to a very shaky, subjective, personal definition of this trope. Full overhauls should be done with more caution than was used here, regardless of how well-versed the user(s) thought they were in the trope.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to..I\\\'m not entirely sure why. Some of the changes are arbitrary, and some are just singular opinions. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. Either it fits, is a subversion, or an aversion. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is really subjective and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there. In general doing a full overhaul of a page unilaterally risks OpinionMyopia and should be done with more caution than it was here, regardless of how well-versed a user thinks they are in the trope.

Those are just the smaller changes. Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up? A lot of the changes seem arbitrary and heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entry according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective on a trope that\\\'s already so complicated, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to..I\\\'m not entirely sure why. Some of the changes are arbitrary, and some are just singular opinions. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. Either it fits, is a subversion, or an aversion. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is really subjective and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there. In general doing a full overhaul of a page unilaterally risks OpinionMyopia and should be done with more caution than it was here, regardless of how well-versed a user thinks they are in the trope.

Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up? A lot of the changes seem kind of arbitrary and heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entry according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to one person\\\'s narrow definition of sociopath. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. Either it fits, is a subversion, or an aversion. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is really subjective and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there. In general doing a full overhaul of a page unilaterally risks OpinionMyopia and should be done with more caution than it was here, regardless of how well-versed a user thinks they are in the trope.

Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up? A lot of the changes seem kind of arbitrary and heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entry according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries according to one person\\\'s narrow definition of sociopath. The fact is, this is an under-researched phenomenon that has conflicting synonyms and definitions. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show/game. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? Removing Bellatrix because \\\"neither bellatrix nor vanitas qualify, as their emotions are simply too strong. whatever pathologies they have, it isn\\\'t sociopathy\\\" is really subjective and feigns authority that isn\\\'t there. In general doing a full overhaul of a page unilaterally risks OpinionMyopia and should be done with more caution than it was here, regardless of how well-versed a user thinks they are in the trope.

Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up? A lot of the changes seem kind of arbitrary and heavily subjective and removed a lot of good examples and material. Honestly, the above changes annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entry according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries, which is just seriously not cool. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages than completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the new Supernatural entries too? In general doing a full overhaul of a page unilaterally risks OpinionMyopia and should be done with more caution than it was here, regardless of how well-versed a user thinks they are in the trope.

Can someone else go through these recent revisions and clean them up? A lot of the changes seem kind of arbitrary and heavily subjective. Honestly, the above change annoyed me, that someone would so clearly change someone\\\'s else\\\'s entry according to their opinion rather than new information or something a little more objective, so I don\\\'t want to do the revision myself and create something biased and even more arbitrary as a result.

Okay I noticed there have been a lot of changes just now on this page, including deleting other people\\\'s entries, which is just seriously not cool. It\\\'s really verging on imposing OpinionMyopia to delete someone else\\\'s entries and then just put your own from your own favorite show. The Vampire Diaries entries for Klaus and Katherine were valid, and removing Klaus completely and switching Katherine to \\\"Though it isn\\\'t certain, Katherine from TheVampireDiaries may be an example. She \\\'\\\'says\\\'\\\' that she cares about others, but it\\\'s difficult to say for sure that she does\\\" is unhelpful. If one person felt like she fits then that\\\'s more in keeping with these pages then completely changing it to adding characters that \\\"may\\\" fit the trope. If you\\\'re not sure, it should just be discussed here, hashed out, and then changed accordingly. Was there not enough space to add the Supernatural entries too? In general doing a full overhaul of a page unilaterally risks OpinionMyopia, regardless of how well-versed a user thinks they are in the trope.