[004]
Redazrael
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \
to:
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \\\"said\\\" about the wording was ActuallyPrettyFunny.
I don\\\'t think that everything was directed toward me, but to be honest, sometimes it was hard to tell what was and what wasn\\\'t, since you didn\\\'t really specify. So I responded to what I thought \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have been directed my way just to be safe. If I got that wrong, I\\\'m sorry.
And I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
\\\'\\\'\\\'Edit #2 in reponse to your Edit #2, can you please just make a new post so I can stop doing this:\\\'\\\'\\\' It\\\'s not a pet peeve and I think it\\\'s unfortunate that you believe that it is. I\\\'m going to ask you a question and I want you answer it honestly. Let\\\'s try a reversal/changing of genders and races:
\\\'\\\'The Survivors\\\'\\\'
REYES: White man
SAM: White man
JONAH: White woman
LARA: Black man
\\\'\\\'Death Toll\\\'\\\'
WHITMAN: Samoan woman
ROTH: Black woman
ALEX: Asian woman
MATHIAS: Black woman
Would you consider that to be worthy of an UnfortunateImplications entry?
I don\\\'t think that everything was directed toward me, but to be honest, sometimes it was hard to tell what was and what wasn\\\'t, since you didn\\\'t really specify. So I responded to what I thought \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have been directed my way just to be safe. If I got that wrong, I\\\'m sorry.
And I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
\\\'\\\'\\\'Edit #2 in reponse to your Edit #2, can you please just make a new post so I can stop doing this:\\\'\\\'\\\' It\\\'s not a pet peeve and I think it\\\'s unfortunate that you believe that it is. I\\\'m going to ask you a question and I want you answer it honestly. Let\\\'s try a reversal/changing of genders and races:
\\\'\\\'The Survivors\\\'\\\'
REYES: White man
SAM: White man
JONAH: White woman
LARA: Black man
\\\'\\\'Death Toll\\\'\\\'
WHITMAN: Samoan woman
ROTH: Black woman
ALEX: Asian woman
MATHIAS: Black woman
Would you consider that to be worthy of an UnfortunateImplications entry?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \
to:
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \\\"said\\\" about the wording was ActuallyPrettyFunny.
I don\\\'t think that everything was directed toward me, but to be honest, sometimes it was hard to tell what was and what wasn\\\'t, since you didn\\\'t really specify. So I responded to what I thought \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have been directed my way just to be safe. If I got that wrong, I\\\'m sorry.
And I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
\\\'\\\'\\\'Edit #2 in reponse to your Edit #2, can you please just make a new post so I can stop doing this:\\\'\\\'\\\' It\\\'s not a pet peeve and I think it\\\'s unfortunate that you believe that it is. I\\\'m going to ask you a question and I want you answer it honestly. Let\\\'s try a reversal/changing of genders and races:
\\\'\\\'The Survivors\\\'\\\'
REYES: White man
SAM: White man
JONAH: White woman
LARA: Black man
\\\'\\\'Death Toll\\\'\\\'
WHITMAN: Samoan woman
ROTH: Black woman
ALEX: Asian woman
MATHIAS: Black woman
Would you consider that to be worthy of an UnfortunateImplications entry?
I don\\\'t think that everything was directed toward me, but to be honest, sometimes it was hard to tell what was and what wasn\\\'t, since you didn\\\'t really specify. So I responded to what I thought \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have been directed my way just to be safe. If I got that wrong, I\\\'m sorry.
And I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
\\\'\\\'\\\'Edit #2 in reponse to your Edit #2, can you please just make a new post so I can stop doing this:\\\'\\\'\\\' It\\\'s not a pet peeve and I think it\\\'s unfortunate that you believe that it is. I\\\'m going to ask you a question and I want you answer it honestly. Let\\\'s try a reversal/changing of genders and races:
\\\'\\\'The Survivors\\\'\\\'
REYES: White man
SAM: White man
JONAH: White woman
LARA: Black man
\\\'\\\'Death Toll\\\'\\\'
WHITMAN: Samoan woman
ROTH: Black woman
ALEX: Asian woman
MATHIAS: Black woman
Would you consider that to be worthy of an UnfortunateImplications entry?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \
to:
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \\\"said\\\" about the wording was ActuallyPrettyFunny.
I don\\\'t think that everything was directed toward me, but to be honest, sometimes it was hard to tell what was and what wasn\\\'t, since you didn\\\'t really specify. So I responded to what I thought \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have been directed my way just to be safe. If I got that wrong, I\\\'m sorry.
And I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
I don\\\'t think that everything was directed toward me, but to be honest, sometimes it was hard to tell what was and what wasn\\\'t, since you didn\\\'t really specify. So I responded to what I thought \\\'\\\'might\\\'\\\' have been directed my way just to be safe. If I got that wrong, I\\\'m sorry.
And I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, as things stand, I prefer my wording, but I appreciate your input.
to:
Well, as things stand, I prefer my wording, but I appreciate your input.
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \\\"said\\\" about the wording was ActuallyPrettyFunny.
I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
Editing in response to your edit: Yes, I got it, which is why I responded the way I did. And, to be honest, what you \\\"said\\\" about the wording was ActuallyPrettyFunny.
I get what you\\\'re saying about going away. I do. But according to the YMMV standards, what I\\\'ve put there is in no way against policy. There is no reason to remove it or demand that it not be posted. There is never going to be 100% agreement about my opinion, but that\\\'s what the YMMV page is for in the first place. So is that an acceptably non-confrontational way to word something you don\\\'t agree with or not?
