Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / GlassSlipper

Go To

Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like so many people with so many different opinons and prespectives are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like [[{{Troper Critical Mass}} so many people]] with so many [[{{YMMV}} different opinons and prespectives]] are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was just under the assumption that just because some people like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was just under the assumption that just because [[{{YMMV}} some people]] like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was under the assumption that just because some people like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was just under the assumption that just because some people like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like so many people with so many different opinons and prespectives are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like so many people with so many different {{YMMV/ Home Page opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was under the assumption that just because some people like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was under the assumption that just because {{YMMV/Home Page some people}} like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like so many people with so many different opinons and prespectives are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like so many people with so many different opinons and prespectives are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to {{YMMV}} page.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Troper Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{YMMV different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like so many people with so many different opinons and prespectives are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{YMMV some people}} like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I was under the assumption that just because some people like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Trope Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{Your Mileage May Vary different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Troper Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{YMMV different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{Your Mileage May Vary some people}} like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{YMMV some people}} like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Trope Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{Your Milege May Vary different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Trope Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{Your Mileage May Vary different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{Your Milege May Vary some people}} like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{Your Mileage May Vary some people}} like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Troper Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{Your Milage May Vary different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
to:
And not a personal attack, just an observation, but I\\\'m getting a very strict, touchy vibe from the page edits. Any other page, fairly critical entries could be posted with no objections from others. But, here, it feels like {{Trope Critical Mass so many people}} with so many {{Your Milege May Vary different opinons and prespectives}} are congesting LOK\\\'s forums, so less flattering views (no matter how critically valid) of the series, are strictly confined to YMMV page.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
I\'d just like to know if there\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{Your Milage May Vary some people}} like LOK\'s pairings/characters doesn\'t mean we shouldn\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
to:
I\\\'d just like to know if there\\\'s a way I could validate these entries while sounding critically ambivilant. I mean Suki was condsidered a {{Flat Character}} and Yue got pegged a {{Shallow Love Interest}}. I mean just because {{Your Milege May Vary some people}} like LOK\\\'s pairings/characters doesn\\\'t mean we shouldn\\\'t analyze their merits as literary devices.
Top