[002]
TrueMetis
Current Version
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
\
to:
\\\"He took a deep breath, and let it steam out. \\\"You don\\\'t like benders twisting your heart? Learn to fight back.\\\"\\\"
Also fire cannot reach everyone as Iroh says \\\"\\\"Strong firebenders can also affect the heart,\\\" Iroh spoke up. \\\"It does not usually reach those outside our own nation. But you are a leader, and a chief\\\'s son. There is, perhaps, enough fire in you to be... susceptible.\\\"\\\"
The Dai Li were affected because they have the willpower needed to fight spirits a fire trait.
Also fire cannot reach everyone as Iroh says \\\"\\\"Strong firebenders can also affect the heart,\\\" Iroh spoke up. \\\"It does not usually reach those outside our own nation. But you are a leader, and a chief\\\'s son. There is, perhaps, enough fire in you to be... susceptible.\\\"\\\"
The Dai Li were affected because they have the willpower needed to fight spirits a fire trait.
Changed line(s) 4 from:
n
I read this, and what it appears to be saying is \
to:
I read this, and what it appears to be saying is \\\"Fans have a theory that this trope could happen in MLP\\\". So it\\\'s (a) ambiguously worded, and (b) incomplete.
If it\\\'s saying \\\"This trope could happen in MLP, but it hasn\\\'t actually yet\\\", then it\\\'s not an example. Only examples that have actually happened are useful.
If it\\\'s saying \\\"This trope has actually happened in MLP, and fans have a theory about why\\\", then
(a) to be a useful example, it should be specific about \\\'\\\'when\\\'\\\' it happened, to \\\'\\\'whom\\\'\\\', and what their thesis and antithesis were;
(b) the bit about the fan theory isn\\\'t really relevant, and is only confusing the issue.
If it\\\'s saying \\\"This trope could happen in MLP, but it hasn\\\'t actually yet\\\", then it\\\'s not an example. Only examples that have actually happened are useful.
If it\\\'s saying \\\"This trope has actually happened in MLP, and fans have a theory about why\\\", then
(a) to be a useful example, it should be specific about \\\'\\\'when\\\'\\\' it happened, to \\\'\\\'whom\\\'\\\', and what their thesis and antithesis were;
(b) the bit about the fan theory isn\\\'t really relevant, and is only confusing the issue.
