[001]
QueenofSwords
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m sorry, but for some reason, what you\'re saying isn\'t quite clicking with me (lack of sleep, I\'m sure). People are aware that we ran into River backwards for most, if not all, of her appearances, so difficulties in following aren\'t an issue. Furthermore, regardless of her \
to:
I\\\'m sorry, but for some reason, what you\\\'re saying isn\\\'t quite clicking with me (lack of sleep, I\\\'m sure). People are aware that we ran into River backwards for most, if not all, of her appearances, so difficulties in following aren\\\'t an issue. Furthermore, regardless of her \\\"devolution\\\", her actions still fit with the trope. Morality being different belongs in either ValuesDissonance or MoralDissonance, however; it\\\'s better taken over there. This trope is about a character\\\'s actions being treated as fine in-story when they\\\'re not. It\\\'s not about bashing characters you don\\\'t like, it\\\'s not about defending characters you \\\'\\\'do\\\'\\\' like. It\\\'s about pointing out examples in-story. Furthermore, her actions in the library aren\\\'t, as yet, treated as a punishment/reward for her actions; it\\\'s better taken to either DrivenToSuicide, RedemptionEqualsDeath, or StableTimeLoop.
