[003]
MetalKing1417
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In the YMMV page, the entry in GeniusBonus that lacks context or references that I believe should be zapped. It says \
to:
In the YMMV page, the entry in GeniusBonus that lacks context or references that I believe should be zapped. It says \\\"The reason the female ghosts are more powerful than the male ones is due to a theory in genetics and parapsychology that if Psychic Powers existed, they would most likely appear in women first.\\\" As you have probably noticed, it does not say what theory it is, and more importantly when searching the wiki devoted to starcraft itself, makes no mention of such a theory anywhere. It is for these reasons that I believe someone made it up or if it is true, it is merely coincidential.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
In the YMMV page, the entry in GeniusBonus that lacks context or references that I believe should be zapped. It says \
to:
In the YMMV page, the entry in GeniusBonus that lacks context or references that I believe should be zapped. It says \\\"The reason the female ghosts are more powerful than the male ones is due to a theory in genetics and parapsychology that if Psychic Powers existed, they would most likely appear in women first.\\\" As you have probably noticed, it does not say what theory it is, and more importantly when searching the wiki devoted to starcraft itself, makes no mention of such a theory anywhere. It is for these reasons that I believe someone made it up.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I agree that River should be up there, definitely. Regardless of character development/devolvement (which count as justifying edits, by the way), she still committed horrific actions in-story that were barely even glanced at overall. Even in River\'s personal future, only her actions of \
to:
I agree that River should be up there, definitely. Regardless of character development/devolvement (which count as justifying edits, by the way), she still committed horrific actions in-story that were barely even glanced at overall. Even in River\\\'s personal future, only her actions of \\\"killing a good man\\\" are looked at askance. However, it shouldn\\\'t be used in comparison or in contrast to Ambrose\\\'s actions in \\\"The Hungry Earth/Cold Blood\\\", as they\\\'re entirely different instances, and they\\\'re not compared in-story.
ETA: I went ahead and cleaned up the example, deleting questionable edits (\\\"devolving\\\" or not, she\\\'s still yet to be called out on it in-story) and getting rid of the comparison. If the Hungry Earth is still counted as an example, it can be added back.
ETA: I went ahead and cleaned up the example, deleting questionable edits (\\\"devolving\\\" or not, she\\\'s still yet to be called out on it in-story) and getting rid of the comparison. If the Hungry Earth is still counted as an example, it can be added back.
