[003]
Ghilz
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
CodeName specifically allow for alphanumeric designations (It\'s in the page\'s very description) so Rifle Two - Two would be no different than an agent 007 or agent 86. It\'s a number. Someone would have that number regardless of that person\'s identity. Furthermore, CodeName\'s description does not exclude position-based code names. TropesAreFlexible.
to:
CodeName specifically allow for alphanumeric designations (It\\\'s in the page\\\'s very description) so Rifle Two - Two would be no different than an agent 007[[hottip:*:There\\\'s both a 006 and a 008. So if bond had never existed, presumably 008 would be 007 instead. And the page uses 007 as an example in its own description. So the same logic can apply to all the numerical designations of Rainbow 6 who follow the same pattern]] or agent 86. It\\\'s a number. Someone would have that number regardless of that person\\\'s identity. Furthermore, CodeName\\\'s description does not exclude position-based code names. TropesAreFlexible.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
CodeName specifically allow for alphanumeric designations (It\'s in the page\'s very description) so Rifle Two - Two would be no different than an agent 007 or agent 86. It\'s a number. Someone would have that number regardless of that person\'s identity.
to:
CodeName specifically allow for alphanumeric designations (It\\\'s in the page\\\'s very description) so Rifle Two - Two would be no different than an agent 007 or agent 86. It\\\'s a number. Someone would have that number regardless of that person\\\'s identity. Furthermore, CodeName\\\'s description does not exclude position-based code names. TropesAreFlexible.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
CodeName specifically allow for alphanumeric designations (It\'s in the page\'s very description) so Rifle Two - Two would be no different than an agent 007 or agent 86. It\'s a number. Someone would have that number regardless of that person\'s identity.
to:
CodeName specifically allow for alphanumeric designations (It\\\'s in the page\\\'s very description) so Rifle Two - Two would be no different than an agent 007 or agent 86. It\\\'s a number. Someone would have that number regardless of that person\\\'s identity.
Furthermore, even if they weren\\\'t examples (and they are), Bear is. As you yourself just said. And you removed it. Please don\\\'t delete examples you yourself admit are valid.
Furthermore, even if they weren\\\'t examples (and they are), Bear is. As you yourself just said. And you removed it. Please don\\\'t delete examples you yourself admit are valid.
