[004]
IraTheSquire
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should exterminated and all churches and temples should be destroyed. And how\'s antitheism too broad a term? Actively opposed to all religions sounds narrow enough for discussion. Also, isn\'t believing that people should not believe in anything be \
to:
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\\\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\\\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should exterminated and all churches and temples should be destroyed. And how\\\'s antitheism too broad a term? Actively opposed to all religions sounds narrow enough for discussion. Also, isn\\\'t trying to make people not believe in anything be \\\"imposing one\\\'s worldview upons others\\\"?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should exterminated and all churches and temples should be destroyed. And how\'s antitheism too broad a term? Actively opposed to all religions sounds narrow enough for discussion.
to:
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\\\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\\\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should exterminated and all churches and temples should be destroyed. And how\\\'s antitheism too broad a term? Actively opposed to all religions sounds narrow enough for discussion. Also, isn\\\'t believing that people should not believe in anything be \\\"imposing one\\\'s worldview upons others\\\"?
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should die and all churches and temples should be destroyed.
to:
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\\\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\\\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should exterminated and all churches and temples should be destroyed. And how\\\'s antitheism too broad a term? Actively opposed to all religions sounds narrow enough for discussion.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should die and all churches and temples should be destroyed.
to:
I get how atheism cannot be fundamentalist: since it is a lack of belief. But why can\\\'t anti-theism: the belief that that no one should have a belief, be fundamentalist? I\\\'ve seen people who believes that all religious people should exterminated and all churches and temples should be destroyed. And how\\\'s antitheism too broad a term? Actively opposed to all religions sounds narrow enough for discussion.
