[003]
EmmaWoodhouse18
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
In short, I still think it needs some better explanation for what makes it different from the super-trope.
to:
In short, I still think it needs some better explanation for what makes it different from the super-trope. The best indication I can find about what makes this trope different is from the media examples - basically, it seems to be a [[ConversedTrope Conversed]] version of AcceptableTargets - but that shouldn\\\'t have to be inferred like that, and there should also be more than two examples for this to deserve its own trope page.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
I still think it needs some better explanation for what makes it different from the super-trope.
to:
In short, I still think it needs some better explanation for what makes it different from the super-trope.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Most cases where there are AcceptableTargets are going to be invoked in-universe. The audience can react negatively to, say, a transgender person who is portrayed completely sympathetic in-universe; that doesn\'t make that character an Acceptable Target, because the show didn\'t portray him/her this way.
to:
But what makes groups AcceptableTargets is already about how they\\\'re portrayed in-universe - as a punchline or a villain rather than more respectfully. Audiences can still react negatively to, say, a transgender character who is portrayed completely sympathetically. That doesn\\\'t change the fact that it is a sympathetic portrayal rather than a case of AcceptableTargets.
