[003]
QueenofSwords
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Also, I don\'t know if you\'ve noticed, but you\'re terribly rude. You may want to work on that - it\'s stated on TV Tropes that rudeness is frowned upon. Thank you!
to:
Also, I don\\\'t know if you\\\'ve noticed, but you\\\'re being very rude. You may want to work on that - it\\\'s stated on TV Tropes that rudeness is frowned upon. Thank you!
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh, I\'m terribly sorry, I didn\'t realize that. I was speaking about Sherlock (see the UnfortunateImplications on that page, if that helps) as well as Doctor Who. I don\'t want to elaborate too much without getting into spoiler territory, since I don\'t know how much of either series you\'ve seen, but the way Irene Adler is handled (feelings, competence, etc.) is, shall we say, less than satisfactory. Furthermore, there are issues in Doctor Who with River Song (again, spoiler territory, but let\'s just say there were people who found her revealed background to be... a little creepy, as far as her relationship with the Doctor goes). While I\'m not saying Moffat\'s sexist, the implications of the way he\'s handled those characters, and other female characters, are... well, unfortunate.
to:
Oh, I\\\'m terribly sorry, I didn\\\'t realize that. I was speaking about Sherlock (see the UnfortunateImplications on that page, if that helps) as well as Doctor Who. I don\\\'t want to elaborate too much without getting into spoiler territory, since I don\\\'t know how much of either series you\\\'ve seen, but the way Irene Adler is handled (feelings, competence, etc.) is, shall we say, less than satisfactory. Furthermore, there are issues in Doctor Who with River Song (again, spoiler territory, but let\\\'s just say there were people who found her revealed background to be... a little creepy, as far as her relationship with the Doctor goes). While I\\\'m not saying Moffat\\\'s sexist, the implications of the way he\\\'s handled those characters, and other female characters, are... well, unfortunate. You might also want to see the discussion page on Steven Moffat\\\'s main page for further insight as well as second opinions.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Oh, I\'m terribly sorry, I didn\'t realize that. I was speaking about Sherlock (see the UnfortunateImplications on that page, if that helps) as well as Doctor Who. I don\'t want to elaborate too much without getting into spoiler territory, but the way Irene Adler is handled (Feelings, competence, etc.) is, shall we say, less than satisfactory. Furthermore, there are issues in Doctor Who with River Song (again, spoiler territory, but let\'s just say there were people who found her revealed background to be... a little creepy, as far as her relationship with the Doctor goes). While I\'m not saying Moffat\'s sexist, the implications of the way he\'s handled those characters, and other female characters, are... well, unfortunate.
to:
Oh, I\\\'m terribly sorry, I didn\\\'t realize that. I was speaking about Sherlock (see the UnfortunateImplications on that page, if that helps) as well as Doctor Who. I don\\\'t want to elaborate too much without getting into spoiler territory, since I don\\\'t know how much of either series you\\\'ve seen, but the way Irene Adler is handled (feelings, competence, etc.) is, shall we say, less than satisfactory. Furthermore, there are issues in Doctor Who with River Song (again, spoiler territory, but let\\\'s just say there were people who found her revealed background to be... a little creepy, as far as her relationship with the Doctor goes). While I\\\'m not saying Moffat\\\'s sexist, the implications of the way he\\\'s handled those characters, and other female characters, are... well, unfortunate.
