[002]
EmmaWoodhouse18
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And as a result, behinds the UnfortunateImplications of equating feminism and misogyny, that difference between the two is why the tropes work in different ways. StrawFeminist characters are often used to discredit feminism as a whole, by showing the most extreme, man-hating, even violent versions and calling it \
to:
And as a result, that difference between the two is why the tropes work in different ways. StrawFeminist characters are often used to discredit feminism as a whole, by showing the most extreme, man-hating, even violent versions and calling it \\\"feminism.\\\" Whereas, this trope isn\\\'t about discrediting misogyny; one doesn\\\'t need an extreme version to do that. It\\\'s usually more about making the particular character out to be a massive douche.
It\\\'s not even about the UnfortunateImplications of (I\\\'m assuming unintentionally) equating feminism and misogyny. It\\\'s the fact that these tropes really don\\\'t work the same way, precisely \\\'\\\'because\\\'\\\' of the difference between a political philosophy and a form of prejudice.
It\\\'s not even about the UnfortunateImplications of (I\\\'m assuming unintentionally) equating feminism and misogyny. It\\\'s the fact that these tropes really don\\\'t work the same way, precisely \\\'\\\'because\\\'\\\' of the difference between a political philosophy and a form of prejudice.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, this shouldn\'t be a SpearCounterpart to the StrawFeminist, for the reasons people pointed out above. A strawman is a more extreme version designed to discredit a typically more reasonable viewpoint.
to:
Well, this shouldn\\\'t be a SpearCounterpart to the StrawFeminist, for the reasons people pointed out above. A strawman is a more extreme version designed to discredit a typically more reasonable viewpoint. Feminism is a reasonable viewpoint in most of its forms. Whereas, misogyny is not reasonable even in a milder form, since it\\\'s prejudice.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
And as a result, behinds the UnfortunateImplications of equating feminism and misogyny, that difference between the two is why the tropes work in different ways. StrawFeminist characters are often used to discredit feminism as a whole, by showing the most extreme, man-hating, even violent versions and calling it \
to:
And as a result, behinds the UnfortunateImplications of equating feminism and misogyny, that difference between the two is why the tropes work in different ways. StrawFeminist characters are often used to discredit feminism as a whole, by showing the most extreme, man-hating, even violent versions and calling it \\\"feminism.\\\" Whereas, this trope isn\\\'t about discrediting misogyny; one doesn\\\'t need an extreme version to do that. It\\\'s usually more about making the particular character out to be a massive douche.
