Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History VisualNovel / TheSongOfSaya

Go To

Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
1. If 2 guys or 2 girls are a couple, we\'re not necessarily privy to anything about their sex lives other than the fact that they\'re attracted to the same gender. This is not or should not be any more revealing than a straight person introducing their partner. But person or couple of any persuasion who says they\'re into BDSM is--by definition--bringing us into their bedroom, which can be TooMuchInformation depending on the context. My boss can talk about his wife all he wants, but I don\'t need or want to know about his sexual fetishes.
to:
1. If 2 guys or 2 girls are a couple, we\\\'re not necessarily privy to anything about their sex lives other than the fact that they\\\'re attracted to the same gender. This is not or should not be any more revealing than a straight person introducing their partner. But person or couple of any persuasion who says they\\\'re into BDSM is--by definition--bringing us into their bedroom, which can be TooMuchInformation depending on the context. My straight boss can talk about his wife all he wants; he can talk about his kids that I can assume he sired through intercourse. But I don\\\'t need or want to know about his specific fetishes. That\\\'s the difference between sexuality and sex acts.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Dude, your baggage is showing. Let\'s break this down:
to:
Wow that was patronizing, and your baggage is showing. Let\\\'s break this down:
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Dude your baggage is showing. I\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts--despite the leaps of logic you just made to compare my argument to homophobia--because we\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community is a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
to:
Dude, your baggage is showing. Let\\\'s break this down:
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When I was pointing out that the parades and festivals in many cities have been desexualized lately to attract families, I didn\'t say it \'\'\'should\'\'\' be that way (or that it shouldn\'t). Only that it is. It\'s clear that your beef isn\'t with me, but the way these things are run. This wiki is not the place for your personal rants. You don\'t have to agree with the lack of bdsm-inclusion in these events (even ignoring that fetishism and bdsm tend to have their own event weekends), but this isn\'t your soapbox, so stick to what IS when describing real life events, not what you think it should be.
to:
1. If 2 guys or 2 girls are a couple, we\\\'re not necessarily privy to anything about their sex lives other than the fact that they\\\'re attracted to the same gender. This is not or should not be any more revealing than a straight person introducing their partner. But person or couple of any persuasion who says they\\\'re into BDSM is--by definition--bringing us into their bedroom, which can be TooMuchInformation depending on the context. My boss can talk about his wife all he wants, but I don\\\'t need or want to know about his sexual fetishes.

2. At no point did I say or imply that the glbtq community is a boys-only club. Whether or not gay men really are overrepresented is a complicated matter. Either way, please stop putting words in my mouth.

3. When I was pointing out that the parades and festivals in many cities have been desexualized lately to attract families, I didn\\\'t say it \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be that way (or that it shouldn\\\'t). Only that it is. It\\\'s clear that your beef isn\\\'t with me, but the way these things are run. This wiki is not the place for your personal rants. You don\\\'t have to agree with the lack of bdsm-inclusion in these events (even ignoring that fetishism and bdsm tend to have their own event weekends), but this isn\\\'t your soapbox, so stick to what IS when describing real life events, not what you think it should be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When I was pointing out that the parades and festivals in many cities have been desexualized lately to attract families, I didn\'t say it \'\'\'should\'\'\' be that way (or shouldn\'t). Only that it is. It\'s clear that your beef isn\'t with me, but the way these things are run. This wiki is not the place for your personal rants. You don\'t have to agree with the lack of bdsm-inclusion in these events (even ignoring that fetishism and bdsm tend to have their own event weekends), but this isn\'t your soapbox, so stick to what IS when describing real life events, not what you think it should be.
to:
When I was pointing out that the parades and festivals in many cities have been desexualized lately to attract families, I didn\\\'t say it \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be that way (or that it shouldn\\\'t). Only that it is. It\\\'s clear that your beef isn\\\'t with me, but the way these things are run. This wiki is not the place for your personal rants. You don\\\'t have to agree with the lack of bdsm-inclusion in these events (even ignoring that fetishism and bdsm tend to have their own event weekends), but this isn\\\'t your soapbox, so stick to what IS when describing real life events, not what you think it should be.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When I was pointing out that the parades and festivals in many cities have been desexualized lately to attract families, I didn\'t say it \'\'\'should\'\'\' (or shouldn\'t) be that way. Only that it is. It\'s clear that your beef isn\'t with me, but the way these things are run. This wiki is not the place for your personal rants. You don\'t have to agree with the lack of bdsm-inclusion in these events (even ignoring that fetishism and bdsm tend to have their own event weekends), but this isn\'t your soapbox, so stick to what IS when describing real life events, not what you think it should be.
to:
When I was pointing out that the parades and festivals in many cities have been desexualized lately to attract families, I didn\\\'t say it \\\'\\\'\\\'should\\\'\\\'\\\' be that way (or shouldn\\\'t). Only that it is. It\\\'s clear that your beef isn\\\'t with me, but the way these things are run. This wiki is not the place for your personal rants. You don\\\'t have to agree with the lack of bdsm-inclusion in these events (even ignoring that fetishism and bdsm tend to have their own event weekends), but this isn\\\'t your soapbox, so stick to what IS when describing real life events, not what you think it should be.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Dude your baggage is showing. I\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts--despite the leaps of logic you just made to compare my argument to homophobia--because we\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
to:
Dude your baggage is showing. I\\\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts--despite the leaps of logic you just made to compare my argument to homophobia--because we\\\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\\\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community is a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Dude your baggage is showing. I\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts (despite the leaps of logic you just used to compare my argument to homophobia), because we\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
to:
Dude your baggage is showing. I\\\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts--despite the leaps of logic you just made to compare my argument to homophobia--because we\\\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\\\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Dude your baggage is showing. I\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts, because we\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
to:
Dude your baggage is showing. I\\\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts (despite the leaps of logic you just used to compare my argument to homophobia), because we\\\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\\\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Wow that was patronizing. I\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts, because we\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
to:
Dude your baggage is showing. I\\\'m just going to agree to disagree on the difference between sexuality and sex acts, because we\\\'ll be here all day otherwise. However, you\\\'re still putting words in my mouth. Not once did I say or imply that the GLBTQ community was a boys-only club (whether or not gay men are overrepresented is a complicated matter).
Top