[018]
marcellX
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had [[AppealToFlattery been more ok with it]]. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HitlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a [[ConfirmationBias ConfusedMatthew fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had [[AppealToFlattery been more ok with it]]. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HitlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew [[ConfirmationBias fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had [[AppealToFlatterybeen more ok with it]]. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HitlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew [[ConfirmationBias fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had [[AppealToFlatterybeen more ok with it]]. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HitlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew [[ConfirmationBias fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HitlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew [[ConfirmationBias fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[AppealToPity he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HittlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew [[ConfirmationBias fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on [[LeftFielder complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities]], you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, [[HittlerAteSugar just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did]], because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew [[ConfirmationBias fan]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, [[BelievingTheirOwnLies keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it]], someone who has shown on this page that \\\'\\\'is\\\'\\\' a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like [[TheDailyShow Jon Stewart]], he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[ArmorPiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', [[Armor-PiercingQuestion does he fall into any of those?]]. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[LameExcuse so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[UnacceptableTarget so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[LameExcuse so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxin talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[LameExcuse so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxim talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \'\'\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\'\'\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[LameExcuse so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameEcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxin talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[LameExcuse so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameExcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxin talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
**sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, [[CompletelyMissingthePoint that doesn\\\'t matter]], the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, [[BlatantLies you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension]], [[CompletelyMissingthePoint which was far from the point]], acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, [[UnacceptableTargets you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid]]. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. You said \\\'\\\'\\\'Its a bit much to expect him to learn enough about Anime for this one little review to confidently critique it.\\\'\\\'\\\' [[CompletelyMissingthePoint I didn\\\'t said he had to research anime as a whole, I didn\\\'t even said he had to research anime at all]], just the movie, because after all he was reviewing [[SpiritedAway it]]. The thing is [[LameExcuse the importance of the review (you call it little review) the length of the review, or why he took the review doesn\\\'t matter]], because like I said [[CompletelyMissingthePoint this is not about him doing a good job or not, or if it\\\'s too much to expect him to do it or if it\\\'s not excuse for doing a bad review]], the point again, is the [[DidNotDotheResearch trope]], he fills the qualifications, [[LameExcuse so why does he get a freebie?]], Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why [[LameEcuse he should get a special pass that no one else has]]. BellisarioMaxin talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics, [[LameExcuse so that\\\'s not an excuse]]. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\'re basically saying, you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that Scary Movie 4 did an error for never showing King Kong who was on the cover. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\\\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that the writters of Scary Movie 4 did an error for not showing King Kong who was on the cover, the posters, etc. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\\\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, you\'re basically saying, you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that Scary Movie 4 did an error for never showing King Kong who was on the cover. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\\\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, trying of belittle my reasons with unrelated trivialities, you\\\'re basically saying, you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that Scary Movie 4 did an error for never showing King Kong who was on the cover. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\\\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\" you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \'\'other\'\' things, you\'re basically saying, you don\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that Scary Movie 4 did an error for never showing King Kong who was on the cover. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\'t do the research: \'\'\'He dind\'t HAVE to do research\'\'\', \'\'that\'\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \'\'specific\'\' question etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \'\'\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\'\'\' see that last part there, \
to:
*sigh* again missing the point, you said the Anime fandom has become the cancer, be it to this page, to this site, to the world, that doesn\\\'t matter, the point is that I wasn\\\'t doing it as a fan or anything, I didn\\\'t say Matthews review sucks or anything, you go on to say that I can\\\'t accept his review except if he had total acceptance and comprehension, which was far from the point, acceptance would be him liking the movie which has nothing to do with DidNotDotheResearch and Comprehension is even a complete different trope it\\\'s CompletelyMissingthePoint, you go on and on complaining about \\\'\\\'other\\\'\\\' things, you\\\'re basically saying, you don\\\'t like him and maybe like anime so any criticism you have is not valid. There are tropes called NeverTrustATrailer, not the same as the cover but for that to work you\\\'ll have to imply that the writer is at fault for every mistake that it\\\'s done by marketing, or that anyone can complain that Scary Movie 4 did an error for never showing King Kong who was on the cover. Bottom line is that you admitted that he didn\\\'t do the research: \\\'\\\'\\\'He dind\\\'t HAVE to do research\\\'\\\'\\\', \\\'\\\'that\\\'\\\' is the point, all your going on and on is reasons why he should get a special pass that no one else has. Bellisario\\\'sMaxin talks about complaining about \\\'\\\'specific\\\'\\\' questions etc. I point you to the DidNotDotheResearch page: first paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Writers in film, television and other media can sometimes be lazy people who cannot be bothered to do proper research on subjects relevant to the plot of their work of fiction. At other times (especially in TV), they just cannot squeeze research into the 10 days or so they get to write a script. In other cases, putting in too much detail would be distracting and annoying. In any case, the research did not get done\\\'\\\'\\\' see that last part there, \\\"In any case, the research did not get done\\\" you can go on and on but the research wasn\\\'t done, second paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'The result is that depictions of events and concepts taken from history, foreign cultures, or the sciences will often be heavily distorted, caricatured, or inaccurately depicted as being analogous to something more familiar to the audience.\\\'\\\'\\\' see that is something that doesn\\\'t \\\'\\\'has\\\'\\\' to be done to make it appeal to everyone because that\\\'s the point of demographics. Third paragraph \\\'\\\'\\\'Often these mistakes will be so glaringly obvious to anyone with any sort of basic knowledge of the subject that it will make the entire work seem completely ridiculous.\\\'\\\'\\\' besides people who live in Japan and nearby, they teach you the basic in Humanity 101, and other classes I can\\\'t remember their names at the moment, the eight line says \\\'\\\'\\\'Note: Situations in which the research may or may not have been done, but is ignored in favor of the story, is ArtisticLicense. When the science in an old work has since been disproven, that\\\'s ScienceMarchesOn; when the historical records change, that\\\'s HistoryMarchesOn. When a factual error is left in because it has become traditional, that\\\'s TheCoconutEffect. For the contrary effect, see LikeRealityUnlessNoted when this is willfully ignored, the RuleOfCool takes effect, or the MST3KMantra is used.\\\'\\\'\\\', does he fall into any of those?. You even said yourself \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"you\\\'re technically correct but splitting hairs\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' it sounds that if I said \\\"I love ConfusedMatthew but he didn\\\'t research SpiritedAway\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\' you would had been more ok with it. Look I like Jon Stewart, he\\\'s very controversial and many right wing people hate him just because he has leniency to the left and go in rage every time he ridicules people they like. \\\'\\\'But\\\'\\\', if one of those people who openly say they hate him (not saying I hate ConfusedMatthew) caught him doing something that goes on DidNotDotheResearch or CompletelyMissingthePoint or any tropes like that, just because it\\\'s those people that did it doesn\\\'t change the fact that he did, because no one is perfect. I ask you to do what I did, clear from your mind that it was about anime, take out from your mind that it was done by someone you like or dislike, now ask yourself, did the event happen? yes? then it\\\'s valid, but like I said, if it bothers you so much I wont put it back there, keep thinking it\\\'s fair just because you like the content in it, someone who has shown on this page that is a ConfusedMatthew fan.
