[002]
Jordan
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Being a law geek here, but the troper who stated that Jane\'s fourth amendment rights were violated was not correct. The Fourth Amendment only would come in if Jane was charged with a crime and the illegally seized notes were used against her as evidence. Otherwise, she\'d be out-of-luck. The recourse for someone whose rights are violated by the government and isn\'t a criminal defendant generally comes through [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871 a provision called section 1983]].
to:
Being a law geek here, but the troper who stated that Jane\\\'s fourth amendment rights were violated was not correct (and Jane herself was kind of wrong too- she could use Darcy\\\'s political science expertise). The Fourth Amendment only would come in if Jane was charged with a crime and the illegally seized notes were used against her as evidence. Otherwise, she\\\'d be out-of-luck. The recourse for someone whose rights are violated by the government and isn\\\'t a criminal defendant generally comes through [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871 a provision called section 1983]].
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Does this now count as one of the TropesTestedByTheMythbusters since the Sound FX ep?
to:
Sorry, wrong button.
