Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / PinballScoring

Go To

[003] FalconPain Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not convinced that the trope is or should be limited to examples where the only reason the numbers are so large is because of gratuitous zeroes. Some of the more popular examples are based on ridiculous use of multipliers or exponential growth. (\'\'GigaWing\'\' used to be the page image, after all, and the new one uses a similar method.) This discrepancy might be tracable back to a paragraph [=PhantomKitty=] added to the description back in January, which makes the whole thing sound like nothing more than the love of appended zeroes. CleverPun\'s added subquote doesn\'t help.
to:
I\\\'m not convinced that the trope is or should be limited to examples where the only reason the numbers are so large is because of gratuitous zeroes. Some of the more popular examples are based on ridiculous use of multipliers or exponential growth. (\\\'\\\'GigaWing\\\'\\\' used to be the page image, after all, and the new one uses a similar method.) This discrepancy might be tracable back to a paragraph [=PhantomKitty=] added to the description back in January, which makes the whole thing sound like nothing more than the love of appended zeroes. Tropers/CleverPun\\\'s added subquote doesn\\\'t help.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not convinced that the trope is or should be limited to examples where the only reason the numbers are so large is because of gratuitous zeroes. Some of the more popular examples are based on ridiculous use of multipliers or exponential growth. (\'\'GigaWing\'\' used to be the page image, after all, and the new one uses a similar method.) This discrepancy might be tracable back to a paragraph [=PhantomKitty=] added to the description back in January, which makes the whole thing sound like nothing more than the love of appended zeroes.
to:
I\\\'m not convinced that the trope is or should be limited to examples where the only reason the numbers are so large is because of gratuitous zeroes. Some of the more popular examples are based on ridiculous use of multipliers or exponential growth. (\\\'\\\'GigaWing\\\'\\\' used to be the page image, after all, and the new one uses a similar method.) This discrepancy might be tracable back to a paragraph [=PhantomKitty=] added to the description back in January, which makes the whole thing sound like nothing more than the love of appended zeroes. CleverPun\\\'s added subquote doesn\\\'t help.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not convinced that the trope is or should be limited to examples where the only reason the numbers are so large is because of gratuitous zeroes. Some of the more popular examples are based on ridiculous use of multipliers or exponential growth. (\'\'GigaWing\'\' used to be the page image, after all.) This discrepancy might be tracable back to a paragraph [=PhantomKitty=] added to the description back in January, which makes the whole thing sound like nothing more than the love of appended zeroes.
to:
I\\\'m not convinced that the trope is or should be limited to examples where the only reason the numbers are so large is because of gratuitous zeroes. Some of the more popular examples are based on ridiculous use of multipliers or exponential growth. (\\\'\\\'GigaWing\\\'\\\' used to be the page image, after all, and the new one uses a similar method.) This discrepancy might be tracable back to a paragraph [=PhantomKitty=] added to the description back in January, which makes the whole thing sound like nothing more than the love of appended zeroes.
Top