[006]
tracer
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[Tropers/Tracer I]] am shocked -- \'\'shocked\'\', do you hear! -- that none of the \
to:
I, Tropers/{{Tracer}}, am shocked -- \\\'\\\'shocked\\\'\\\', do you hear! -- that none of the \\\"{{Shipping}}\\\" related tropes appear among the tropes of legend. What with everybody speculating about who\\\'s doing it with whom, for just about every show ever made.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[Users/Tracer I]] am shocked -- \'\'shocked\'\', do you hear! -- that none of the \
to:
[[Tropers/Tracer I]] am shocked -- \\\'\\\'shocked\\\'\\\', do you hear! -- that none of the \\\"{{Shipping}}\\\" related tropes appear among the tropes of legend. What with everybody speculating about who\\\'s doing it with whom, for just about every show ever made.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
[[User/Tracer I]] am shocked -- \'\'shocked\'\', do you hear! -- that none of the \
to:
[[Users/Tracer I]] am shocked -- \\\'\\\'shocked\\\'\\\', do you hear! -- that none of the \\\"Shipping\\\" related tropes appear among the tropes of legend. What with everybody speculating about who\\\'s doing it with whom, for just about every show ever made.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, the thing is that originally type IV was simply worded in terms of \
to:
Well, the thing is that originally type IV was simply worded in terms of \\\"character for which the mental flaws/problems start to take over\\\", which in combination with placing characters like Shinji or Haruhi alongside hardened serial-killers, and extremely common treatment of this sort from North American media, made the trope/page read as making the statement \\\"if you have mental handicaps, or are simply automatically functioning in a somewhat obnoxious manner, that means that you are comparable to the most ruthless mass-murderers in the history of humanity, regardless if you have overactive conscience and have never hurt a fly\\\"; i.e. extremely anvilicious in the first place to me.
Then again plenty of Internet afficionados (or othervise), fan-media writers, and even quite a few \\\"official\\\" media creators, although they tend to attempt to be more \\\"subtle\\\" about it to avoid hate-speech suits, take this notion even more ridiculously far, by loudly proclaiming that harmless isn\\\'t \\\'\\\'just\\\'\\\' equivalent to mass-murder, no it is infinitely worse; as honest mass-murder for kicks is perfectly fine, and there are plenty of glorious social benefits of genocide, whereas anybody with serious disabilities is a thoroughly reprehensible piece of pond scum that should be strangled by his/her own mother at birth or have a magasine emptied into the face by the nearest \\\"upright humanitarian bystander\\\". Again, I\\\'m basically quoting here, and as such essentially in a constant FacePalm mood at times.
As for cclospina, from what I remember she \\\'\\\'outright\\\'\\\' listed category I as morally worse than type IV, which in combination with her fixation on ByronicHero as \\\"the worst scum of all\\\" (which also read more like being about mental problems than ruthlessness to me) created a suspicious impression regarding her moral viewpoint, but I apologise if I overreacted.
Then again plenty of Internet afficionados (or othervise), fan-media writers, and even quite a few \\\"official\\\" media creators, although they tend to attempt to be more \\\"subtle\\\" about it to avoid hate-speech suits, take this notion even more ridiculously far, by loudly proclaiming that harmless isn\\\'t \\\'\\\'just\\\'\\\' equivalent to mass-murder, no it is infinitely worse; as honest mass-murder for kicks is perfectly fine, and there are plenty of glorious social benefits of genocide, whereas anybody with serious disabilities is a thoroughly reprehensible piece of pond scum that should be strangled by his/her own mother at birth or have a magasine emptied into the face by the nearest \\\"upright humanitarian bystander\\\". Again, I\\\'m basically quoting here, and as such essentially in a constant FacePalm mood at times.
As for cclospina, from what I remember she \\\'\\\'outright\\\'\\\' listed category I as morally worse than type IV, which in combination with her fixation on ByronicHero as \\\"the worst scum of all\\\" (which also read more like being about mental problems than ruthlessness to me) created a suspicious impression regarding her moral viewpoint, but I apologise if I overreacted.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, the thing is that originally type IV was simply worded in terms of \
to:
Well, the thing is that originally type IV was simply worded in terms of \\\"character for which the mental flaws/problems start to take over\\\", which in combination with placing characters like Shinji or Haruhi alongside hardened serial-killers, and extremely common treatment of this sort from North American media, made the trope/page read as making the statement \\\"if you have mental handicaps, or are simply automatically functioning in a somewhat obnoxious manner, that means that you are comparable to the most ruthless mass-murderers in the history of humanity, regardless if you have overactive conscience and have never hurt a fly\\\"; i.e. extremely anvilicious in the first place to me.
Then again plenty of Internet afficionados (or othervise), fan-media writers, and even quite a few \\\"official\\\" media creators, take this notion even more ridiculously far, by loudly proclaiming that harmless isn\\\'t \\\'\\\'just\\\'\\\' equivalent to mass-murder, no it is infinitely worse; as honest mass-murder for kicks is perfectly fine, and there are plenty of glorious social benefits of genocide, whereas anybody with serious disabilities is a thoroughly reprehensible piece of pond scum that should be strangled by his/her own mother at birth or have a magasine emptied into the face by the nearest \\\"upright humanitarian bystander\\\". Again, I\\\'m basically quoting here, and as such essentially in a constant FacePalm mood at times.
As for cclospina, from what I remember she \\\'\\\'outright\\\'\\\' listed category I as morally worse than type IV, which in combination with her fixation on ByronicHero as \\\"the worst scum of all\\\" (which also read more like being about mental problems than ruthlessness to me) created a suspicious impression regarding her moral viewpoint, but I apologise if I overreacted.
Then again plenty of Internet afficionados (or othervise), fan-media writers, and even quite a few \\\"official\\\" media creators, take this notion even more ridiculously far, by loudly proclaiming that harmless isn\\\'t \\\'\\\'just\\\'\\\' equivalent to mass-murder, no it is infinitely worse; as honest mass-murder for kicks is perfectly fine, and there are plenty of glorious social benefits of genocide, whereas anybody with serious disabilities is a thoroughly reprehensible piece of pond scum that should be strangled by his/her own mother at birth or have a magasine emptied into the face by the nearest \\\"upright humanitarian bystander\\\". Again, I\\\'m basically quoting here, and as such essentially in a constant FacePalm mood at times.
As for cclospina, from what I remember she \\\'\\\'outright\\\'\\\' listed category I as morally worse than type IV, which in combination with her fixation on ByronicHero as \\\"the worst scum of all\\\" (which also read more like being about mental problems than ruthlessness to me) created a suspicious impression regarding her moral viewpoint, but I apologise if I overreacted.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Well, the thing is that originally type IV was simply worded in terms of \
to:
Well, the thing is that originally type IV was simply worded in terms of \\\"character for which the mental flaws/problems start to take over\\\", which in combination with placing characters like Shinji or Haruhi alongside hardened serial-killers, and extremely common treatment of this sort from North American media, made the trope/page read as making the statement \\\"if you have mental handicaps, or are simply automatically functioning in a somewhat obnoxious manner, that means that you are comparable to the most ruthless mass-murderers in the history of humanity, regardless if you have overactive conscience and have never hurt a fly\\\"; i.e. extremely anvilicious in the first place to me.
As for cclospina, from what I remember she \\\'\\\'outright\\\'\\\' listed category I as morally worse than type IV, which in combination with her fixation on ByronicHero as \\\"the worst scum of all\\\" (which also read more like being about mental problems than ruthlessness to me) created a suspicious impression regarding her moral viewpoint, but I apologise if I overreacted.
As for cclospina, from what I remember she \\\'\\\'outright\\\'\\\' listed category I as morally worse than type IV, which in combination with her fixation on ByronicHero as \\\"the worst scum of all\\\" (which also read more like being about mental problems than ruthlessness to me) created a suspicious impression regarding her moral viewpoint, but I apologise if I overreacted.
