Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think it would be haresplitting. :) Hare is used in the title simply because rhymes with hair, and the hope is that people will think of rabbits as interchangeable with hares for the purpose of this trope, even if that is not factually accurate. Generally fictional trope articles are better when they don\'t get bogged down with RealLife details.
to:
I think it would be haresplitting. :) Hare is used in the title simply because rhymes with hair, and the hope is that people will think of rabbits as interchangeable with hares for the purpose of this trope, even if that is not factually accurate. Generally fictional trope articles are better when they don\\\'t get bogged down with RealLife details.
Perhaps a few words at the end would provide a hint: turn
\\\"Plus, any animal with huge buck teeth is bound to have a nasty bite, regardless of diet.\\\"
into
\\\"Plus, rabbits have huge buck teeth and a nasty bite. Hares are bigger and are willing to use that bite.\\\"
Perhaps a few words at the end would provide a hint: turn
\\\"Plus, any animal with huge buck teeth is bound to have a nasty bite, regardless of diet.\\\"
into
\\\"Plus, rabbits have huge buck teeth and a nasty bite. Hares are bigger and are willing to use that bite.\\\"
[001]
Camacan
MOD
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I think it would be harespltting. :) Hare is used in the title simply because rhymes with hair, and the hope is that people will think of rabbits as interchangeable with hares for the purpose of this trope, even if that is not factually accurate. Generally fictional trope articles are better when they don\'t get bogged down with RealLife details.
to:
I think it would be haresplitting. :) Hare is used in the title simply because rhymes with hair, and the hope is that people will think of rabbits as interchangeable with hares for the purpose of this trope, even if that is not factually accurate. Generally fictional trope articles are better when they don\\\'t get bogged down with RealLife details.
