[007]
Motmot
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], and frankly, you launching it for us would\'ve been fine, but you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 (and \'Lowers\'?) example when those are not examples by the trope\'s original description (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most instances of this the way I\'ve seen it support the original description more (or if anyone else feels that way for that matter) we don\'t mind discussing it. I\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not reverting Yegdip\'s and my edits to the description? Thank you for reading.
to:
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\\\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], and frankly, you launching it for us would\\\'ve been fine, but you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 exmaple (and the \\\'\\\'Losers\\\'\\\' example too I believe?) when those are not examples by the trope\\\'s original description (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\\\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\\\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\\\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most instances of this the way I\\\'ve seen it support the original description more (or if anyone else feels that way for that matter) we don\\\'t mind discussing it. I\\\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\\\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not reverting Yegdip\\\'s and my edits to the description? Thank you for reading.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], and frankly, you launching it for us would\'ve been fine, but you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when it\'s not an example by the trope\'s original description (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most instances of this the way I\'ve seen it support the original description more (or if anyone else feels that way for that matter) we don\'t mind discussing it. I\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not changing Yegdip\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
to:
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\\\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], and frankly, you launching it for us would\\\'ve been fine, but you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 (and \\\'Lowers\\\'?) example when those are not examples by the trope\\\'s original description (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\\\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\\\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\\\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most instances of this the way I\\\'ve seen it support the original description more (or if anyone else feels that way for that matter) we don\\\'t mind discussing it. I\\\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\\\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not reverting Yegdip\\\'s and my edits to the description? Thank you for reading.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=] and frankly, you launching it for us would\'ve been fine, you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when, by the trope\'s original description, it\'s not an example (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most of the examples support the original description (or if anyone else does for that matter) we don\'t mind hearing your side of the discussion. I\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not changing Yegdip\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
to:
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\\\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], and frankly, you launching it for us would\\\'ve been fine, but you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when it\\\'s not an example by the trope\\\'s original description (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\\\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\\\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\\\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most instances of this the way I\\\'ve seen it support the original description more (or if anyone else feels that way for that matter) we don\\\'t mind discussing it. I\\\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\\\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not changing Yegdip\\\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\'s [=YKTTW=], it was not up for grabs nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when, by the trope\'s original description, it\'s not an example (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. I\'m not looking to start a conflict and I honestly don\'t know if this is a good place to tell you this, but my friend\'s feelings are kind of hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not changing Yegdip\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
to:
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\\\'s [=YKTTW=] and it was not up for grabs, nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=] and frankly, you launching it for us would\\\'ve been fine, you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when, by the trope\\\'s original description, it\\\'s not an example (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\\\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\\\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\\\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. If you feel the trope is better off with the emphasis on stealth/chase despite the fact that most of the examples support the original description (or if anyone else does for that matter) we don\\\'t mind hearing your side of the discussion. I\\\'m not looking to start a conflict or an edit war, but my friend\\\'s feelings are hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not changing Yegdip\\\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\'s YKTTW, it was not up for grabs nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch) and not only did you launch it, but you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when, by the trope\'s original description, it\'s not an example (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. I\'m not looking to start a conflict and I honestly don\'t know if this is a good place to tell you this, but my friend\'s feelings are kind of hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her YKTTW sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the YKTTW, or at least not changing Yegdip\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
to:
Um, hey, Worldmaker? I love the work you did on the EvilOverlordList and all, but this was my close friend\\\'s [=YKTTW=], it was not up for grabs nor did she abandon it (in fact, she was waiting for me to check it over before launch). While I realize that anyone can launch something from [=YKTTW=], you keep editing the description to suit the Toy Story 3 example when, by the trope\\\'s original description, it\\\'s not an example (Woody escaped through the bathroom incidentally. He didn\\\'t need to go through it because it was the only place he could get privacy). Yegdip and I like your wording, but we feel that you\\\'ve changed the meaning too much by taking the emphasis off the situation where the person\\\'s already captured and placing it instead to put the emphasis on a chase/stealth sequence. I\\\'m not looking to start a conflict and I honestly don\\\'t know if this is a good place to tell you this, but my friend\\\'s feelings are kind of hurt and now I feel responsible for not checking over her [=YKTTW=] sooner, so would you mind please honoring the original intent of the [=YKTTW=], or at least not changing Yegdip\\\'s and my edits? Thank you for reading.
