[022]
ChibiKibou
Current Version
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \'It\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. Especially given the fixes I watched occur during that month, as well as the improvements, additions and events have been implemented since.
to:
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \\\'It\\\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\\\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. Not to mention the fixes I watched occur during that extra month, as well as the improvements, additions and events have been implemented since.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \'It\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. Especially given the fixes I watched occur during that month, as well as the improvements have been implemented since.
to:
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \\\'It\\\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\\\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. Especially given the fixes I watched occur during that month, as well as the improvements, additions and events have been implemented since.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \'It\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about.
to:
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \\\'It\\\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\\\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. Especially given the fixes I watched occur during that month, as well as the improvements have been implemented since.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \'It\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present the gaming media appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. There\'s barely even been mention of the staffing shake-up, so far as I have seen, let alone continued ranting about the state of Final Fantasy XIV.
to:
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \\\'It\\\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\\\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present gaming literature at large appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
As stated in edit history, while the first half of the sub-entry makes a point (and I have thus left it in place), the review it references has been called out over and over in its comments - and for good reason. While laudably fair-handed with macro-level stuff like story and setting, The review appears to be a hasty re-hash of an already comparatively poor review written early on but for some reason held back until now. Not only does it highlight issues that have, in fact, already been rectified, it misunderstands and misrepresents a number of aspects of the game (not least fatigue, which the reviewer claims strikes within just 8 guild leves).
to:
As stated in edit history, while the first half of the sub-entry makes a point (and I have thus left it in place), the review it references has been called out over and over in its comments - and for good reason. While laudably fair-handed with macro-level stuff like story and setting, the review appears to be a hastily adjusted piece written early on but for some reason held back until now. Not only does it highlight issues that have, in fact, already been rectified such as interface lag, it misunderstands and misrepresents a number of aspects of the game (not least fatigue, which the reviewer claims strikes within just 8 guild leves).
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \'It\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date experience; especially given the fact that at present the gaming media appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. There\'s barely even been mention of the staffing shake-up, so far as I have seen, let alone continued ranting about the state of Final Fantasy XIV.
to:
So, once again, as per the edit note, if you wish to re-add something along the lines of \\\'It\\\'s also worth noting that, as of late December, the [[{{Reference}} negative reviews are]] [[{{Link}} still pouring in]], so they apparently didn’t put the extra month to good use,\\\' I strongly suggest finding more than just the one lazy and incorrect review based on months out-of-date impressions; especially given the fact that at present the gaming media appears to have actually gotten bored and found other things to write about. There\\\'s barely even been mention of the staffing shake-up, so far as I have seen, let alone continued ranting about the state of Final Fantasy XIV.
