Discussion History Webcomic / Sonichu

bbb

I don\\\'t care if the majority present disagrees or not, I have every right to have an opinion about the movie, and I\\\'m not going to water it down. And aside from that very first time (which I did mainly to make a point because the troll was harassing me on youtube with arguments that came down to \\\"tvtropes disagrees with you, therefore you\\\'re wrong!!!!\\\"), I haven\\\'t attempted to insert \\\"oh and the movie sucks!\\\" onto the main page.

And BTW, I\\\'ve addressed why that explanation doesn\\\'t work either. If you read my previous few posts in this very thread (which you either didn\\\'t read, or are ignoring), I addressed it there. If the mook didn\\\'t believe it, then why would Nizam reward him? Even if he was already paid, why stick around? If it didn\\\'t work, there\\\'s a good chance Nizam would pull a YouHaveFailedMe.

And here\\\'s a question for you: WHY does that scene even need to exist? Are you seriously telling me the movie wouldn\\\'t be improved without the revelation about the Guardian? Did we REALLY need to know how Nizam found out about the dagger?

And I really get sick of this idea that you keep pushing that I simply don\\\'t like the movie, therefore I\\\'m seeing plot holes that aren\\\'t there, and apparently you don\\\'t even feel the need to read anything I\\\'m posting to find out whether that\\\'s true or not (since, if you had, you would know that I\\\'d already addressed the explanation you gave above). But, know what, I love Batman Begins, but I can spot plot holes in it. For example:

The League of Shadows destroys cities that have reached the peak of their decadence. They tried to destroy Gotham by wrecking the economy, and making everyone a criminal...so, before everyone was a criminal, what reason did they have to destroy it.

But, I must be lying about liking Batman Begins! Because clearly I wouldn\\\'t see plot holes in it if I didn\\\'t hate it!

Also, I disagree with this apparent notion that if something can be rationalized, its not a plot-hole. And no, not everything needs to be spelled out, but if we go with that definition, then plot-holes don\\\'t exist, because there is no plot-hole so great that it can\\\'t be rationalized if you stretch logic far enough. For example, \\\"clearly these two contradictory scenes are happening in alternate universes, where the laws of physics function differently.\\\" Naturally, there is a place for FridgeBrilliance, but that requires subtle clues, not a complete absense of information. Furthermore, FridgeBrilliance doesn\\\'t expect the audience to make up rationalizations to explain major plot points like the Guardian\\\'s betrayal that don\\\'t make any sense based solely on the information we\\\'ve been given.

I don\\\'t care if the majority present disagrees or not, I have every right to have an opinion about the movie, and I\\\'m not going to water it down. And aside from that very first time (which I did mainly to make a point because the troll was harassing me on youtube with arguments that came down to \\\"tvtropes disagrees with you, therefore you\\\'re wrong!!!!\\\"), I haven\\\'t attempted to insert \\\"oh and the movie sucks!\\\" onto the main page.

And BTW, I\\\'ve addressed why that explanation doesn\\\'t work either. If you read my previous few posts in this very thread (which you either didn\\\'t read, or are ignoring), I addressed it there. If the mook didn\\\'t believe it, then why would Nizam reward him? Even if he was already paid, why stick around? If it didn\\\'t work, there\\\'s a good chance Nizam would pull a YouHaveFailedMe.

And here\\\'s a question for you: WHY does that scene even need to exist? Are you seriously telling me the movie wouldn\\\'t be improved without the revelation about the Guardian? Did we REALLY need to know how Nizam found out about the dagger?

And I really get sick of this idea that you keep pushing that I simply don\\\'t like the movie, therefore I\\\'m seeing plot holes that aren\\\'t there, and apparently you don\\\'t even feel the need to read anything I\\\'m posting to find out whether that\\\'s true or not (since, if you had, you would know that I\\\'d already addressed the explanation you gave above). But, know what, I love Batman Begins, but I can spot plot holes in it. For example:

The League of Shadows destroys cities that have reached the peak of their decadence. They tried to destroy Gotham by wrecking the economy, and making everyone a criminal...so, before everyone was a criminal, what reason did they have to destroy it.

But, I must be lying about liking Batman Begins! Because clearly I wouldn\\\'t see plot holes in it if I didn\\\'t hate it!

(if you want it to rest, why do you keep responding?)

I don\\\'t care if it pisses you off or not, I have every right to have an opinion about the movie, and I\\\'m not going to water it down. And aside from that very first time (which I did mainly to make a point because the troll was harassing me on youtube with arguments that came down to \\\"tvtropes disagrees with you, therefore you\\\'re wrong!!!!\\\"), I haven\\\'t attempted to insert \\\"oh and the movie sucks!\\\" onto the main page.

And BTW, I\\\'ve addressed why that explanation doesn\\\'t work either. If you read my previous few posts in this very thread (which you either didn\\\'t read, or are ignoring), I addressed it there. If the mook didn\\\'t believe it, then why would Nizam reward him? Even if he was already paid, why stick around? If it didn\\\'t work, there\\\'s a good chance Nizam would pull a YouHaveFailedMe.

And here\\\'s a question for you: WHY does that scene even need to exist? Are you seriously telling me the movie wouldn\\\'t be improved without the revelation about the Guardian? Did we REALLY need to know how Nizam found out about the dagger?

And I really get sick of this idea that you keep pushing that I simply don\\\'t like the movie, therefore I\\\'m seeing plot holes that aren\\\'t there, and apparently you don\\\'t even feel the need to read anything I\\\'m posting to find out whether that\\\'s true or not (since, if you had, you would know that I\\\'d already addressed the explanation you gave above). But, know what, I love Batman Begins, but I can spot plot holes in it. For example:

The League of Shadows destroys cities that have reached the peak of their decadence. They tried to destroy Gotham by wrecking the economy, and making everyone a criminal...so, before everyone was a criminal, what reason did they have to destroy it.

But, I must be lying about liking Batman Begins! Because clearly I wouldn\\\'t see plot holes in it if I didn\\\'t hate it!