Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History VideoGame / CitizenSleeper

Go To

[007] Ramidel Current Version
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
# It\'s still more efficient to make money and buy food than to work the commune and earn food. Even if you can synthesize stabilizers at the commune, that\'s still not an argument for \'\'working shifts\'\' there once you\'ve joined.
to:
# It\\\'s still more efficient to make money and buy food than to work the commune and earn food. Even if you can synthesize stabilizers at the commune, that\\\'s still not an argument for \\\'\\\'working shifts\\\'\\\' there once you\\\'ve joined. (Also, I\\\'m pretty sure that it\\\'s actually more efficient and reliable to not complete the Yatagan storyline, earn money and buy stabilizer than to farm for it, due to the RNG inherent in getting clubheads.)
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
@/{{Qualia}}, your argument for removing this is that it\'s factually incorrect, which it\'s really not.
to:
@/{{Qualia}}, your argument for removing this is that it\\\'s factually incorrect. But...
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
So the Aesop is still broken. Your argument doesn\'t have any relevance to the facts of the entry.
to:
So the Aesop is still broken, and I\\\'m pretty sure none of the facts in my entry were incorrect.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
So the Aesop is still broken.
to:
So the Aesop is still broken. Your argument doesn\\\'t have any relevance to the facts of the entry.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
@/Qualia, your argument for removing this is that it\'s factually incorrect, which it\'s not.
to:
@/{{Qualia}}, your argument for removing this is that it\\\'s factually incorrect, which it\\\'s really not.
Changed line(s) 11 from:
n
So the Aesop is still broken. Your own statement is factually incorrect.
to:
So the Aesop is still broken.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
# It\'s still more efficient to make money and buy food than to work the commune and earn food. Even if you can synthesize stabilizers at the commune, that\'s still not an argument for working there once you\'ve joined.
to:
# It\\\'s still more efficient to make money and buy food than to work the commune and earn food. Even if you can synthesize stabilizers at the commune, that\\\'s still not an argument for \\\'\\\'working shifts\\\'\\\' there once you\\\'ve joined.
# It\\\'s still shown that the Commune can\\\'t differentiate its ass from its elbow when they need to get resources from the outside, hence having to con the repair bay and pay in mushrooms.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
Qualia, your argument for removing this is that it\'s factually incorrect, which it\'s not.
to:
@/Qualia, your argument for removing this is that it\\\'s factually incorrect, which it\\\'s not.
Changed line(s) 8 from:
n
# It\'s still more efficient to make money and buy food than to work the commune and earn food.
to:
# It\\\'s still more efficient to make money and buy food than to work the commune and earn food. Even if you can synthesize stabilizers at the commune, that\\\'s still not an argument for working there once you\\\'ve joined.
Changed line(s) 10 from:
n
So the Aesop is still broken.
to:
So the Aesop is still broken. Your own statement is factually incorrect.
Top