Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Manga / AzumangaDaioh

Go To

[005] SensuBean Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory (and no I don\'t really have a personal bone to pick with Wikipedia, as on average the contributors have been among the most civilised and honest people I have encountered on the Internet. There are problems with bureaucracy and interest-groups who try to manipulate or censor the information, but there is an even larger amount of unsung decent people who make an effort to prevent that sort of thing but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \
to:
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\\\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory (and no I don\\\'t really have a personal bone to pick with Wikipedia, as on average the contributors have been among the most civilised and honest people I have encountered on the Internet. There are problems with bureaucracy and interest-groups who try to manipulate or censor the information, but there is an even larger amount of unsung decent people who make an effort to prevent that sort of thing) but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \\\"top 10%\\\" area, and asked for honest help in further additions and restructuring, so there goes that snarky(/irrelevant distraction) implication.

It\\\'s also a redundant mention that regardless of honesty we can\\\'t escape subjectivity, but my entire point was that at least we should make an attempt to weed out the most impressive ones, and not allow anything whatsoever. This was a starting attempt, not a final solution, but at least I made an effort.

If you want to reword the borrowed basic mediaminer definition that bigoted, hate-spewing, or rape-endorsing filth have no redeeming artistic value, or simply want to remove a few words, then write up a suggestion here.

Anyway, returning to the sticking point, the basic definition of this page is that it should only display stories that can strongly be argued to place in the top 10%, othervise it inevitably boils down to self-promotion/whoever among the authors and acquaintances of authors for the thousands of stories out there, who know of and bother with this place with whatever alternative handle they choose. And I don\\\'t have the impression that most contributors are open regarding this. Thrythlind/Nanya was/were \\\'\\\'deliberately\\\'\\\' honest about the self-promotion. It\\\'s very easy not to be.

Shadow Chronicles has received awards for being an extremely well-written and tightly plotted fanfic and is probably the most applauded story among the ffml mainstays. Dark Titans is iffy, as the first part starts very weak, but the Brushogun arc was extremely well delivered, and there is no denying that other popular authors find it to be very creatively written, especially in terms of characterisation. Despite unfortunate somewhat elitistic implications, this really is something considerably more useful for me than random personal favourites from unknown quantities/editors.

You do obviously have a point about that the section needs further work however, for starters I haven\\\'t read all of the mentioned fics in the second section, and the inclusion of others, such as Right Moments, WFRose, etc, are probably very debatable.Another point is the unfortunate, and already lampshaded, somewhat pretentious word usage, but again, alrernatives are welcome.

Anyway, suggestions about how we should do the weeding system are useful, but there should probably be some basic \\\"I am usually using this writer/community member handle at fanfiction.net or elsewhere\\\" at least somewhat open disclosure dependency.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory (and no I don\'t really have a personal bone to pick with Wikipedia, as on average the contributors have been among the most civilised and honest people I have encountered on the Internet. There are problems with bureaucracy and interest-groups who try to manipulate or censor the information, but there is an even larger amount of unsung decent people who make an effort to prevent that sort of thing but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \
to:
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\\\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory (and no I don\\\'t really have a personal bone to pick with Wikipedia, as on average the contributors have been among the most civilised and honest people I have encountered on the Internet. There are problems with bureaucracy and interest-groups who try to manipulate or censor the information, but there is an even larger amount of unsung decent people who make an effort to prevent that sort of thing but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \\\"top 10%\\\" area, and asked for honest help in further additions and restructuring, so there goes that snarky(/irrelevant distraction) implication.

It\\\'s also a redundant mention that regardless of honesty we can\\\'t escape subjectivity, but my entire point was that at least we should make an attempt to weed out the most impressive ones, and not allow anything whatsoever. This was a starting attempt, not a final solution, but at least I made an effort.

If you want to reword the borrowed basic mediaminer definition that bigoted, hate-spewing, or rape-endorsing filth have no redeeming artistic value, or simply want to remove a few words, then write up a suggestion here.

Anyway, returning to the sticking point, the basic definition of this page is that it should only display stories that can strongly be argued to place in the top 10%, othervise it inevitably boils down to self-promotion/whoever among the authors and acquaintances of authors for the thousands of stories out there, who know of and bother with this place with whatever alternative handle they choose. And I don\\\'t have the impression that most contributors are open regarding this. Thrythlind/Nanya was/were \\\'\\\'deliberately\\\'\\\' honest about the self-promotion. It\\\'s very easy not to be.

Shadow Chronicles has received awards for being an extremely well-written and tightly plotted fanfic and is probably the most applauded story among the ffml mainstays. Dark Titans is iffy, as the first part starts very weak, but the Brushogun arc was extremely well delivered, and there is no denying that other popular authors find it to be very creatively written, especially in terms of characterisation. Despite unfortunate somewhat elitistic implications, this really is something considerably more useful for me than random personal favourites from unknown quantities/editors.

You do obviously have a point about that the section needs further work however, for starters I haven\\\'t read all of the mentioned fics in the second section, and the inclusion of others, such as Right Moments, WFRose, etc, are probably very debatable.Another point is the unfortunate, and already lampshaded, somewhat pretentious word usage, but again, alrernatives are welcome.

Anyway, suggestions about how we should do the weeding system are useful, but there should probably be some basic \\\"I am usually using this writer/community member handle at fanfiction.net or elsewhere\\\" at least somewhat open disclosure dependency.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory, but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \
to:
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\\\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory (and no I don\\\'t really have a personal bone to pick with Wikipedia, as on average the contributors have been among the most civilised and honest people I have encountered on the Internet. There are problems with bureaucracy and interest-groups who try to manipulate or censor the information, but there is an even larger amount of unsung decent people who make an effort to prevent that sort of thing but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \\\"top 10%\\\" area, and asked for honest help in further additions and restructuring, so there goes that snarky(/irrelevant distraction) implication.

It\\\'s also a redundant mention that regardless of honesty we can\\\'t escape subjectivity, but my entire point was that at least we should make an attempt to weed out the most impressive ones, and not allow anything whatsoever. This was a starting attempt, not a final solution, but at least I made an effort.

If you want to reword the borrowed basic mediaminer definition that bigoted, hate-spewing, or rape-endorsing filth have no redeeming artistic value, or simply want to remove a few words, then write up a suggestion here.

Anyway, returning to the sticking point, the basic definition of this page is that it should only display stories that can strongly be argued to place in the top 10%, othervise it inevitably boils down to self-promotion/whoever among the authors and acquaintances of authors for the thousands of stories out there, who know of and bother with this place with whatever alternative handle they choose. And I don\\\'t have the impression that most contributors are open regarding this. Thrythlind/Nanya was/were \\\'\\\'deliberately\\\'\\\' honest about the self-promotion. It\\\'s very easy not to be.

Shadow Chronicles has received awards for being an extremely well-written and tightly plotted fanfic and is probably the most applauded story among the ffml mainstays. Dark Titans is iffy, as the first part starts very weak, but the Brushogun arc was extremely well delivered, and there is no denying that other popular authors find it to be very creatively written, especially in terms of characterisation. Despite unfortunate somewhat elitistic implications, this really is something considerably more useful for me than random personal favourites from unknown quantities/editors.

Anyway, suggestions about how we should do the weeding system are useful, but there should probably be some basic \\\"I am usually using this writer/community member handle at fanfiction.net or elsewhere\\\" at least somewhat open disclosure dependency.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory, but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \
to:
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\\\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory, but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \\\"top 10%\\\" area, and asked for honest help in further additions and restructuring, so there goes that snarky(/irrelevant distraction) implication.

It\\\'s also a redundant mention that regardless of honesty we can\\\'t escape subjectivity, but my entire point was that at least we should make an attempt to weed out the most impressive ones, and not allow anything whatsoever. This was a starting attempt, not a final solution, but at least I made an effort.

If you want to reword the borrowed basic mediaminer definition that bigoted, hate-spewing, or rape-endorsing filth have no redeeming artistic value, or simply want to remove a few words, then write up a suggestion here.

Anyway, returning to the sticking point, the basic definition of this page is that it should only display stories that can strongly be argued to place in the top 10%, othervise it inevitably boils down to self-promotion/whoever among the authors and acquaintances of authors for the thousands of stories out there, who know of and bother with this place with whatever alternative handle they choose. And I don\\\'t have the impression that most contributors are open regarding this. Thrythlind/Nanya was/were \\\'\\\'deliberately\\\'\\\' honest about the self-promotion. It\\\'s very easy not to be.

Shadow Chronicles has received awards for being an extremely well-written and tightly plotted fanfic and is probably the most applauded story among the ffml mainstays. Dark Titans is iffy, as the first part starts very weak, but the Brushogun arc was extremely well delivered, and there is no denying that other popular authors find it to be very creatively written, especially in terms of characterisation. Despite unfortunate somewhat elitistic implications, this really is something considerably more useful for me than random personal favourites from unknown quantities/editors.

Anyway, suggestions about how we should do the weeding system are useful, but there should probably be some basic \\\"I am usually using this writer/community member handle at fanfiction.net or elsewhere\\\" at least somewhat open disclosure dependency.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory, but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \
to:
And I heavily disagree, although sure I\\\'m an autistic editor, anal-retentive comes with the territory, but if you take a potshot at that definition, so does considerably less filters and ability to lie either to oneself or others(/genuine honesty), not to mention that I put fics that I personally despise into the \\\"top 10%\\\" area, and asked for honest help in further additions and restructuring, so there goes that snarky(/irrelevant distraction) implication.

It\\\'s also a redundant mention that regardless of honesty we can\\\'t escape subjectivity, but my entire point was that at least we should make an attempt to weed out the most impressive ones, and not allow anything whatsoever. This was a starting attempt, not a final solution, but at least I made an effort.

If you want to reword the borrowed basic mediaminer definition that bigoted, hate-spewing, or rape-endorsing filth have no redeeming artistic value, or simply want to remove a few words, then write up a suggestion here.

Anyway, returning to the sticking point, the basic definition of this page is that it should only display stories that can strongly be argued to place in the top 10%, othervise it inevitably boils down to self-promotion/whoever among the authors and acquaintances of authors for the thousands of stories out there, who know of and bother with this place with whatever alternative handle they choose. And I don\\\'t have the impression that most contributors are open regarding this. Thrythlind/Nanya was/were \\\'\\\'deliberately\\\'\\\' honest about the self-promotion. It\\\'s very easy not to be.

Shadow Chronicles has received awards for being an extremely well-written and tightly plotted fanfic and is probably the most applauded story among the ffml mainstays. Dark Titans is iffy, as the first part starts very weak, but the Brushogun arc was extremely well delivered, and there is no denying that other popular authors find it to be very creatively written, especially in terms of characterisation.

Anyway, suggestions about how we should do the weeding system are useful, but there should probably be some basic \\\"I am this writer/community member\\\" open disclosure dependency.
Top