[003]
JamesGS8
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The \
to:
The \\\"anachronism stew\\\" part of the page suggests that the game \\\"has functions that could not have possibly been in a console game of the time,\\\" but does not include any examples of such functions.
Having tinkered with homebrew PSX development, and also having recreated parts of Petscop itself, the only things that seem impossible are a few very small details, like the game\\\'s color depth, which are mostly products of the creator not using an actual PSX game to create the videos, and a few things which appear to be supernatural, such as a second player character perfectly predicting Paul\\\'s exact movements during Petscop 9.
Unless there\\\'s something I\\\'m missing, this section of the page seems very misleading.
Having tinkered with homebrew PSX development, and also having recreated parts of Petscop itself, the only things that seem impossible are a few very small details, like the game\\\'s color depth, which are mostly products of the creator not using an actual PSX game to create the videos, and a few things which appear to be supernatural, such as a second player character perfectly predicting Paul\\\'s exact movements during Petscop 9.
Unless there\\\'s something I\\\'m missing, this section of the page seems very misleading.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The \
to:
The \\\"anachronism stew\\\" part of the page suggests that the game \\\"has functions that could not have possibly been in a console game of the time,\\\" but does not include any examples of such functions.
Having tinkered with homebrew PSX development, and also having recreated parts of Petscop itself, the only things that seem impossible are a few very small details, like the game\\\'s color depth, which are mostly products of the creator not using an actual PlayStation game to create the videos, and a few things which appear to be supernatural, such as a second player character perfectly predicting Paul\\\'s exact movements during Petscop 9.
Unless there\\\'s something I\\\'m missing, this section of the page seems very misleading.
Having tinkered with homebrew PSX development, and also having recreated parts of Petscop itself, the only things that seem impossible are a few very small details, like the game\\\'s color depth, which are mostly products of the creator not using an actual PlayStation game to create the videos, and a few things which appear to be supernatural, such as a second player character perfectly predicting Paul\\\'s exact movements during Petscop 9.
Unless there\\\'s something I\\\'m missing, this section of the page seems very misleading.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The \
to:
The \\\"anachronism stew\\\" part of the page suggests that the game \\\"has functions that could not have possibly been in a console game of the time,\\\" but does not include any examples of such functions.
Having tinkered with homebrew PSX development, and also having recreated parts of Petscop itself, the only things that seem impossible are a few very small details, like the game\\\'s color depth, which are mostly products of the creator not using an actual PlayStation game to create the videos, and a few things which appear to be supernatural, such as a second player character perfectly predicting Paul\\\'s exact movements during Petscop 9.
Unless there\\\'s something I\\\'m missing, this section of the page seems very misleading.
Having tinkered with homebrew PSX development, and also having recreated parts of Petscop itself, the only things that seem impossible are a few very small details, like the game\\\'s color depth, which are mostly products of the creator not using an actual PlayStation game to create the videos, and a few things which appear to be supernatural, such as a second player character perfectly predicting Paul\\\'s exact movements during Petscop 9.
Unless there\\\'s something I\\\'m missing, this section of the page seems very misleading.
