[001]
67.180.205.190
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
More to the point, it\'s use probably violates Steve McCurry\'s copyright on the image. Wikipedia specifically states in their Fair Use Rationale (which looks valid to me, but IANAL) that the article is *about* the picture itself. However, that rationale does not apply in this case and so this is probably an infringement.
to:
More to the point, its use probably violates Steve McCurry\\\'s copyright on the image. Wikipedia specifically states in their Fair Use Rationale (which looks valid to me, but IANAL) that the article is *about* the picture itself. However, that rationale does not apply in this case and so this is probably an infringement.
