Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion History Main / TheWikiRule

Go To

Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
@[=Awesomekid42=]: Okay, I see your point now. I had missed that the Disruptors\' statements included actual perjuries, and also forgot that Helen had said the same statements were a way to \
to:
@[=Awesomekid42=]: Okay, I see your point now. I had missed that the Disruptors\\\' statements included actual perjuries, and also missed that Helen had said the same statements were a way to \\\"lie for the truth.\\\" \\\"I saw the napkin he burned\\\" is true, as Helen clearly presented it to the Disruptors and Miles couldn\\\'t refute it was the real deal, but Claire seeing Miles grab the gun is unlikely, as she\\\'d probably say something earlier if she feared for her life, and Lionel seeing him driving away from Andi\\\'s house is unlikely as he said he thought Miles was in Greece. I\\\'ll concede the discussion.

@Larkmarn: So what you\\\'re saying is, \\\"That\\\'s some heavy-duty conjecture\\\"?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
@[=Awesomekid42=]: Okay, I see your point now. I had missed that the Disruptors\' statements included actual perjuries, and also forgot that Andi had said the same statements were a way to \
to:
@[=Awesomekid42=]: Okay, I see your point now. I had missed that the Disruptors\\\' statements included actual perjuries, and also forgot that Helen had said the same statements were a way to \\\"lie for the truth.\\\" \\\"I saw the napkin he burned\\\" is true, as Helen clearly presented it to the Disruptors and Miles couldn\\\'t refute it was the real deal, but Claire seeing Miles grab the gun is unlikely, as she\\\'d probably say something earlier if she feared for her life, and Lionel seeing him driving away from Andi\\\'s house is unlikely as he said he thought Miles was in Greece. I\\\'ll concede the discussion.

@Larkmarn: So what you\\\'re saying is, \\\"That\\\'s some heavy-duty conjecture\\\"?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
@Awesomekid42: Okay, I see your point now. I had missed that the Disruptors\' statements included actual perjuries, and also forgot that Andi had said the same statements were a way to \
to:
@[=Awesomekid42=]: Okay, I see your point now. I had missed that the Disruptors\\\' statements included actual perjuries, and also forgot that Andi had said the same statements were a way to \\\"lie for the truth.\\\" \\\"I saw the napkin he burned\\\" is true, as Helen clearly presented it to the Disruptors and Miles couldn\\\'t refute it was the real deal, but Claire seeing Miles grab the gun is unlikely, as she\\\'d probably say something earlier if she feared for her life, and Lionel seeing him driving away from Andi\\\'s house is unlikely as he said he thought Miles was in Greece. I\\\'ll concede the discussion.

@Larkmarn: So what you\\\'re saying is, \\\"That\\\'s some heavy-duty conjecture\\\"?
Top