[007]
Raxis
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
If you have complaints about edit conduct on another work\'s YMMV page then you need to bring it up to discussion on that page. As I\'ve unfortunately been told on this site many times, ignorance of the rules is no excuse.
to:
If you have complaints about edit conduct on another work\\\'s YMMV page then you need to bring it up to discussion on that page. As I\\\'ve been told on this site many times, ignorance of the rules is no excuse.
Changed line(s) 5 from:
n
\'\'\
to:
\\\'\\\'\\\"The fandom\\\'s tendency to shoehorn a good canon character into being a villain or make a villain significantly more evil than in canon is Ron the Death Eater\\\"\\\'\\\'
The morality of the character from canon is irrelevant. All that matters is whether the person is being portrayed more negatively.
\\\'\\\'\\\"and she does canonically refer to Dimitri as the \\\"King of Delusions\\\"\\\"\\\'\\\'
Her tone is sorrowful, not mocking. She\\\'s not trying to insult his mental state, she\\\'s lamenting the state he was in in the end.
Compare that to;
\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"Not that she could neglect Dimitri, as Ladislava\\\'s death had proven painfully clear. But it was obvious that he was the weak link among the leaders; half mad (his laughter in the chamber, manic behavior in battle, and absurd fixation on the idea that she had somehow \\\'betrayed\\\' him made that clear) and likely reliant on Claude for strategy and Byleth to keep himself alive in battle.\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
She also later regards him as \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"that naïve lunatic\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
Which is clearly just mocking and disregarding his mental capacity. Edelgard never disregards him this way in canon.
\\\'\\\'\\\"and dismisses Claude as a potential ruler for Fodlan based on his supposed lack of knowledge about it\\\"\\\'\\\'
How can that even be inferred to be about his mixed heritage?
Compare that to;
\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"arrogant, ignorant foreigner\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"that wretched half blood\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
And, frankly, this is without even getting into other things like Edelgard tricking civilians into becoming Demonic Beasts when we have no idea what subjects were being used to create them and whether or not those subjects agreed or were forced into it in canon.
The morality of the character from canon is irrelevant. All that matters is whether the person is being portrayed more negatively.
\\\'\\\'\\\"and she does canonically refer to Dimitri as the \\\"King of Delusions\\\"\\\"\\\'\\\'
Her tone is sorrowful, not mocking. She\\\'s not trying to insult his mental state, she\\\'s lamenting the state he was in in the end.
Compare that to;
\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"Not that she could neglect Dimitri, as Ladislava\\\'s death had proven painfully clear. But it was obvious that he was the weak link among the leaders; half mad (his laughter in the chamber, manic behavior in battle, and absurd fixation on the idea that she had somehow \\\'betrayed\\\' him made that clear) and likely reliant on Claude for strategy and Byleth to keep himself alive in battle.\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
She also later regards him as \\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"that naïve lunatic\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
Which is clearly just mocking and disregarding his mental capacity. Edelgard never disregards him this way in canon.
\\\'\\\'\\\"and dismisses Claude as a potential ruler for Fodlan based on his supposed lack of knowledge about it\\\"\\\'\\\'
How can that even be inferred to be about his mixed heritage?
Compare that to;
\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"arrogant, ignorant foreigner\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
\\\'\\\'\\\'\\\"that wretched half blood\\\"\\\'\\\'\\\'
And, frankly, this is without even getting into other things like Edelgard tricking civilians into becoming Demonic Beasts when we have no idea what subjects were being used to create them and whether or not those subjects agreed or were forced into it in canon.
