[003]
RomWatt
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I see that VillainousBSOD and VillainousBreakdown are separate tropes, where the former is somewhat closer to HeroicBSOD\'s meaning, or rather its first interpretation where a character basically stops responding and is fairly subdued, whereas the latter is much more intense and shares some similarities with SanitySlippage, NotSoStoic and especially FreakOut, in which a villain loses their composure and just goes ham...
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same trope? Shouldn\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same trope? Shouldn\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \
to:
I see that VillainousBSOD and VillainousBreakdown are separate tropes, where the former is somewhat closer to HeroicBSOD\\\'s meaning, or rather its first interpretation where a character basically stops functioning and is typically subdued in its execution, whereas the latter is much more intense and shares some similarities with SanitySlippage, NotSoStoic and especially FreakOut, in which a villain loses their composure and just goes ham...
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same trope? Shouldn\\\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \\\"not-villainous\\\" version of a VillainousBreakdown, as in, a character loses their composure?
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same trope? Shouldn\\\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \\\"not-villainous\\\" version of a VillainousBreakdown, as in, a character loses their composure?
Changed line(s) 2 from:
n
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same tropes? Shouldn\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \
to:
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same trope? Shouldn\\\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \\\"not-villainous\\\" version of a VillainousBreakdown, as in, a character loses their composure?
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I see that VillainousBSOD and VillainousBreakdown are separate tropes, where the former is somewhat closer to HeroicBSOD\'s meaning, or rather its first interpretation where a character basically stops responding and is fairly subdued, whereas the latter is much more intense and shares some similarities with SanitySlippage, FreakOut and NotSoStoic, in which a villain loses their composure and just goes ham...
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same tropes? Shouldn\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same tropes? Shouldn\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \
to:
I see that VillainousBSOD and VillainousBreakdown are separate tropes, where the former is somewhat closer to HeroicBSOD\\\'s meaning, or rather its first interpretation where a character basically stops responding and is fairly subdued, whereas the latter is much more intense and shares some similarities with SanitySlippage, NotSoStoic and especially FreakOut, in which a villain loses their composure and just goes ham...
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same tropes? Shouldn\\\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \\\"not-villainous\\\" version of a VillainousBreakdown?
So that leaves me wondering, why are HeroicBSOD and HeroicBreakdown treated as the same tropes? Shouldn\\\'t a Heroic Breakdown be treated as the heroic, or at the very least, \\\"not-villainous\\\" version of a VillainousBreakdown?
