[002]
dragonfire5000
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The mentions of the Axiom creating humans and two messiahs is in context of the \'\'IV\'\' duology universe; the part where he and the Goddess mention it only say \'\'the\'\' universe. Nowhere does it say that there is only one way to create \
to:
The mentions of the Axiom creating humans and two messiahs is in context of the \\\'\\\'IV\\\'\\\' duology universe; the part where he and the Goddess mention it only say \\\'\\\'the\\\'\\\' universe. Nowhere does it say that there is only one way to create \\\"messiahs\\\" across multiple universes, so there isn\\\'t explicit confirmation that the Axiom is responsible for Hero, Aleph, and Demi-fiend.
I don\\\'t think AmbiguousSituation is the correct entry to use, since the thing about the Axiom is something that the game itself never brings up as ambiguous and the characters never ponder about. Interestingly enough, AmbiguousSituation is NOT an audience reaction, so it seems like it requires some objectivity in it.
If an Axiom character entry is written for \\\'\\\'IV Apocalypse\\\'\\\', it should not mention the Great Will since the game the Axiom appears in does not mention the Great Will at all. Mentions that it may be the Great Will would count as Administrivia/SpeculativeTroping.
Which, on a related note, probably means that mentions of the Aleph = Hijiri fan theory on the \\\'\\\'Nocturne\\\'\\\' character page needs to be scrubbed out as well, considering that said theory seems to have originated in the West and that Japanese fans, from what I heard, don\\\'t really subscribe to that theory since the original texts don\\\'t really do anything to imply a connection...
I don\\\'t think AmbiguousSituation is the correct entry to use, since the thing about the Axiom is something that the game itself never brings up as ambiguous and the characters never ponder about. Interestingly enough, AmbiguousSituation is NOT an audience reaction, so it seems like it requires some objectivity in it.
If an Axiom character entry is written for \\\'\\\'IV Apocalypse\\\'\\\', it should not mention the Great Will since the game the Axiom appears in does not mention the Great Will at all. Mentions that it may be the Great Will would count as Administrivia/SpeculativeTroping.
Which, on a related note, probably means that mentions of the Aleph = Hijiri fan theory on the \\\'\\\'Nocturne\\\'\\\' character page needs to be scrubbed out as well, considering that said theory seems to have originated in the West and that Japanese fans, from what I heard, don\\\'t really subscribe to that theory since the original texts don\\\'t really do anything to imply a connection...
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
The mentions of the Axiom creating humans and two messiahs is in context of the \'\'IV\'\' duology universe; the part where he and the Goddess mention it only say \'\'the\'\' universe. Nowhere does it say that there is only one way to create \
to:
The mentions of the Axiom creating humans and two messiahs is in context of the \\\'\\\'IV\\\'\\\' duology universe; the part where he and the Goddess mention it only say \\\'\\\'the\\\'\\\' universe. Nowhere does it say that there is only one way to create \\\"messiahs\\\" across multiple universes, so there isn\\\'t explicit confirmation that the Axiom is responsible for Hero, Aleph, and Demi-fiend.
I don\\\'t think AmbiguousSituation is the correct entry to use, since the thing about the Axiom is something that the game itself never brings up as ambiguous and the characters never ponder about. Interestingly enough, AmbiguousSituation is NOT an audience reaction, so it seems like it requires some objectivity in it.
If an Axiom character entry is written for \\\'\\\'IV Apocalypse\\\'\\\', it should not mention the Great Will since the game the Axiom appears in does not mention the Great Will at all. Mentions that it may be the Great Will would count as Administrivia/SpeculativeTroping.
Which, on a related note, probably means that mentions of the Aleph = Hijiri stuff on the \\\'\\\'Nocturne\\\'\\\' character page needs to be scrubbed out as well, considering that said theory seems to have originated in the West and that Japanese fans, from what I heard, don\\\'t really subscribe to that theory since the original texts don\\\'t really do anything to imply a connection...
I don\\\'t think AmbiguousSituation is the correct entry to use, since the thing about the Axiom is something that the game itself never brings up as ambiguous and the characters never ponder about. Interestingly enough, AmbiguousSituation is NOT an audience reaction, so it seems like it requires some objectivity in it.
If an Axiom character entry is written for \\\'\\\'IV Apocalypse\\\'\\\', it should not mention the Great Will since the game the Axiom appears in does not mention the Great Will at all. Mentions that it may be the Great Will would count as Administrivia/SpeculativeTroping.
Which, on a related note, probably means that mentions of the Aleph = Hijiri stuff on the \\\'\\\'Nocturne\\\'\\\' character page needs to be scrubbed out as well, considering that said theory seems to have originated in the West and that Japanese fans, from what I heard, don\\\'t really subscribe to that theory since the original texts don\\\'t really do anything to imply a connection...
