[004]
Larkmarn
Current Version
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
What\'s changed is a DOI guy appointed by Trump is saying that \
to:
What\\\'s changed is a DOI guy appointed by Trump is saying that \\\"it\\\'s totally a coincidence, guys.\\\" Believing \\\"We wanted to put up fences, and \\\'\\\'just happened\\\'\\\' to crackdown on peaceful protests on a late evening well after anyone would put up fences [[note]]DC was locked down under curfew by the time of Trump\\\'s photo op[[/note]]and that \\\'\\\'just happened\\\'\\\' to coincide with Trump doing a photo op\\\" is... honestly adorable. Keep that naivete.
\\\"The DOI wanted the area clear\\\" and \\\"the White House \\\'\\\'needed\\\'\\\' the area clear \\\'\\\'now\\\'\\\'\\\" aren\\\'t mutually exclusive statements.
Frankly given the timeframe it would be more damning to the administration if they \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gas the protesters because that\\\'s such an incompetent move to schedule something and not have the ability to actually do it safely.
A Trump crony saying \\\"oh yah Trump was 200% right\\\" isn\\\'t exactly a compelling argument.
\\\"The DOI wanted the area clear\\\" and \\\"the White House \\\'\\\'needed\\\'\\\' the area clear \\\'\\\'now\\\'\\\'\\\" aren\\\'t mutually exclusive statements.
Frankly given the timeframe it would be more damning to the administration if they \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gas the protesters because that\\\'s such an incompetent move to schedule something and not have the ability to actually do it safely.
A Trump crony saying \\\"oh yah Trump was 200% right\\\" isn\\\'t exactly a compelling argument.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
What\'s changed is a DOI guy appointed by Trump is saying that \
to:
What\\\'s changed is a DOI guy appointed by Trump is saying that \\\"it\\\'s totally a coincidence, guys.\\\" Believing \\\"We wanted to put up fences, and \\\'\\\'just happened\\\'\\\' to crackdown on peaceful protests on a late evening well after anyone would put up fences [[note]]DC was locked down under curfew by the time of Trump\\\'s photo op[[/note]]and that \\\'\\\'just happened\\\'\\\' to coincide with Trump doing a photo op\\\" is... hoenstly adorable. Keep that naivete.
\\\"The DOI wanted the area clear\\\" and \\\"the White House \\\'\\\'needed\\\'\\\' the area clear \\\'\\\'now\\\'\\\'\\\" aren\\\'t mutually exclusive statements.
Frankly given the timeframe it would be more damning to the administration if they \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gas the protesters because that\\\'s such an incompetent move to schedule something and not have the ability to actually do it safely.
A Trump crony saying \\\"oh yah Trump was 200% right\\\" isn\\\'t exactly a compelling argument.
\\\"The DOI wanted the area clear\\\" and \\\"the White House \\\'\\\'needed\\\'\\\' the area clear \\\'\\\'now\\\'\\\'\\\" aren\\\'t mutually exclusive statements.
Frankly given the timeframe it would be more damning to the administration if they \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gas the protesters because that\\\'s such an incompetent move to schedule something and not have the ability to actually do it safely.
A Trump crony saying \\\"oh yah Trump was 200% right\\\" isn\\\'t exactly a compelling argument.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
The protesters were there legally, but their right to protest was revoked (for no reason) before being gassed.
to:
The protesters were there legally, but their right to protest was revoked before being gassed.
Changed line(s) 7 from:
n
What\'s changed is a DOI guy appointed by Trump is saying that \
to:
What\\\'s changed is a DOI guy appointed by Trump is saying that \\\"it\\\'s totally a coincidence, guys.\\\" Believing \\\"We wanted to put up fences, and \\\'\\\'just happened\\\'\\\' to crackdown on peaceful protests on a late evening well after anyone would put up fences and that \\\'\\\'just happened\\\'\\\' to coincide with Trump doing a photo op\\\" is... hoenstly adorable. Keep that naivete.
\\\"The DOI wanted the area clear\\\" and \\\"the White House \\\'\\\'needed\\\'\\\' the area clear \\\'\\\'now\\\'\\\'\\\" aren\\\'t mutually exclusive statements.
Frankly given the timeframe it would be more damning to the administration if they \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gas the protesters because that\\\'s such an incompetent move to schedule something and not have the ability to actually do it safely.
A Trump crony saying \\\"oh yah Trump was 200% right\\\" isn\\\'t exactly a compelling argument.
\\\"The DOI wanted the area clear\\\" and \\\"the White House \\\'\\\'needed\\\'\\\' the area clear \\\'\\\'now\\\'\\\'\\\" aren\\\'t mutually exclusive statements.
Frankly given the timeframe it would be more damning to the administration if they \\\'\\\'didn\\\'t\\\'\\\' gas the protesters because that\\\'s such an incompetent move to schedule something and not have the ability to actually do it safely.
A Trump crony saying \\\"oh yah Trump was 200% right\\\" isn\\\'t exactly a compelling argument.
