[004]
rva98014
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When this issue was posted to \
to:
When this issue was posted to \\\"Is this an Example\\\" it got no feedback. I posted a reworded version of the question here:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it came across badly in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting works as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
EDIT: It\\\'s now a moot point. Moderator crazysamaritan has pointed out that the responses from various ATT and \\\"Is this a trope\\\" postings yield a firm consensus that Raya is not an example of \\\"VillainHasAPoint\\\".
see:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=98794&type=att
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it came across badly in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting works as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
EDIT: It\\\'s now a moot point. Moderator crazysamaritan has pointed out that the responses from various ATT and \\\"Is this a trope\\\" postings yield a firm consensus that Raya is not an example of \\\"VillainHasAPoint\\\".
see:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/query.php?parent_id=98794&type=att
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When this issue was posted to \
to:
When this issue was posted to \\\"Is this an Example\\\" it got no feedback. I posted a reworded version of the question here:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it came across badly in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting works as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it came across badly in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting works as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When this issue was posted to \
to:
When this issue was posted to \\\"Is this an Example\\\" it got no feedback. I posted a reworded version of the question here:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it came through badly in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting works as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it came through badly in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting works as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
When this issue was posted to \
to:
When this issue was posted to \\\"Is this an Example\\\" it got no feedback. I posted a reworded version of the question here:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it just didn\\\'t come through well in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting comes across as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=13543987200A54420100&page=613#15320
Troper [=underCoverSailsman=] asked some follow-up questions that I found interesting. Look up his questions and my responses and his conclusion on the same page.
So far [=underCoverSailsman=], [=RoundRobin=], Tuvok, [=SGamer82=] and myself have all weighed in on Namaari being at fault, plus the non-Tvtropes opinions of Cellspex and Honest Trailers.
I\\\'ll grant that it seems that the intention of the framing was to give Namaari some weight to her claims, but it just didn\\\'t come through well in the final product. So much so that I don\\\'t think the intention counts for much anymore especially lacking any sort of Word of God support.
I just don\\\'t think Namaari\\\'s blame-casting comes across as VillainHasAPoint anymore.
